4pko: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
== Function == | == Function == | ||
[https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/ | [https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q7BGE6_ECOLX Q7BGE6_ECOLX] Binds to Cpn60 in the presence of Mg-ATP and suppresses the ATPase activity of the latter (By similarity).[SAAS:SAAS018369_004_006304][RuleBase:RU000535][HAMAP-Rule:MF_00580] | ||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | <div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | ||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | == Publication Abstract from PubMed == |
Latest revision as of 11:29, 9 October 2024
Crystal structure of the Football-shaped GroEL-GroES2-(ADPBeFx)14 complexCrystal structure of the Football-shaped GroEL-GroES2-(ADPBeFx)14 complex
Structural highlights
FunctionQ7BGE6_ECOLX Binds to Cpn60 in the presence of Mg-ATP and suppresses the ATPase activity of the latter (By similarity).[SAAS:SAAS018369_004_006304][RuleBase:RU000535][HAMAP-Rule:MF_00580] Publication Abstract from PubMedThe GroE chaperonins assist substrate protein (SP) folding by cycling through several conformational states. With each cycle the SP is, in turn, captured, unfolded, briefly encapsulated (t1/2 approximately 1 s), and released by the chaperonin complex. The protein-folding functional form is the US-football-shaped GroEL:GroES2 complex. We report structures of two such "football" complexes to approximately 3.7-A resolution; one is empty whereas the other contains encapsulated SP in both chambers. Although encapsulated SP is not visible on the electron density map, using calibrated FRET and order-of-addition experiments we show that owing to SP-catalyzed ADP/ATP exchange both chambers of the football complex encapsulate SP efficiently only if the binding of SP precedes that of ATP. The two rings of GroEL thus behave as a parallel processing machine, rather than functioning alternately. Compared with the bullet-shaped GroEL:GroES1 complex, the GroEL:GroES2 football complex differs conformationally at the GroEL-GroES interface and also at the interface between the two GroEL rings. We propose that the electrostatic interactions between the epsilon-NH3+ of K105 of helix D in one ring with the negatively charged carboxyl oxygen of A109 at the carboxyl end of helix D of the other ring provide the structural basis for negative inter-ring cooperativity. Formation and structures of GroEL:GroES2 chaperonin footballs, the protein-folding functional form.,Fei X, Ye X, LaRonde NA, Lorimer GH Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 18. pii: 201412922. PMID:25136110[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. See AlsoReferences
|
|