Sandbox20
This sandbox is in use for Usyd BCHM3981 until June, 2011. Please do not edit this page.
IntroductionIntroduction
Replication Termination in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilisReplication Termination in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis
The replication of chromosomal DNA in most bacterial species occurs through a bidirectional mechanism, whereby two replication forks derived from the same origin of replication travel in opposite directions.[1] This gives rise to the characteristic theta-shaped structure as the nascent DNA loop connecting the replication forks is generated. While the use of two replisomes, one at each fork, accelerates replication, the phase of termination must be carefully coordinated. Specific sequences known as Ter sites lie just beyond the halfway point for each replisome. These halt the advance of replication forks in a direction-specific manner, and thereby form a replication fork trap. As a result, each replisome can traverse only slightly more than half of the DNA before it is arrested. Together, the two sets of Ter sites define the terminus region where replication is terminated and the two forks fuse.
The function of the replication fork trap is enacted by the binding of termination proteins to Ter sites. In E. coli, this is done by termination utilisation substance (Tus), and the functionally corresponding protein in B. subtilis is replication termination protein (RTP). The importance of these replication fork traps is still a matter of debate, as their inactivation does not interfere greatly with cell cycle progression[2], nor does it affect the well-being of daughter cells following cell division. However, the fact that the structurally and sequentially dissimilar Tus and RTP proteins both bind to ill-conserved Ter sites to elicit the same biological function suggests an evolutionary pressure towards a termination mechanism that involves replication fork traps. It has been noted that the majority of genes in the B. subtilis genome have their promoters proximal to the origin of replication. Terminating replication before the replisome reaches the promoters may help the smooth running of transcriptional processes [3] [4].
During fork fusion, it is proposed that the fork arriving at the permissive face of the replication fork trap displaces the terminator protein and causes the disassembly of the replisome. A combination of helicase, toposiomerase, polymerase and ligase then fill the remaining gaps to make a chromosome dimer with the two full-length chromosomes joined. RecQ, topoisomerase III, single-strand binding protein (SSBP) and DNA polymerase I are said to play a role in this process [5]. Finally, site-specific recombination takes place at the dif site to produce two identical monomeric chromosomes [6].
The ProteinsThe Proteins
RTPRTP
|
Replication termination protein (RTP) binds to the Ter sites of B. subtilis, to halt progression of the replication fork. Two structurally identical RTP molecules form a dimeric complex upon binding to DNA. The Ter site is 30 bp in length, and contains an imperfect inverted 16 bp repeat overlapping at a highly conserved trinucleotide sequence (TAT). Differences in sequence distinguish the upstream Ter A domain from the downstream Ter B domain. These bind their respective RTP molecules in slightly different manners, creating an asymmetric complex which will only halt the progression of the replication fork if the B site is encountered first. The mechanism by which this is achieved is discussed below in relation to the structure of the .
Structural OverviewStructural Overview
The structure of an RTP monomer bears greatest similarity to the "classic winged-helix" motif, in which 'wings' project from the loop between the final two β sheets of a compact αβααββ structure. The two major variations from this theme are the absence of a β1 sheet (the corresponding region is instead termed the β1 loop), and the presence of a fourth elongate α-helix, which facilitates dimerisation. Each of these secondary structural elements are indicated in the structure .
The crystal structure of RTP was originally determined in 1995 [7] in its unbound state, and submitted under the entry 1bm9. Since then, three additional structures have been determined. The first of these, 1f4k, is of the RTP-DNA complex. The second, 1j0r is of a single cysteine mutant. The most recent, 2efw, indicates the DNA-RTP complex in its native state and reveals an insight into the molecular mechanism of contrahelicase activity.
DNA BindingDNA Binding
13-15 residues contribute to the attachment of an RTP molecule to the Ter DNA site. Most of this is contributed by the basic residues of the , which lies in the major groove of DNA.
Space
Space
Space
Space
The asymmetry of the dimer is shown by the names 'wing up' and 'wing down'. It is measured by the angle between the a2 and a3 heices, as shown .
Space
Space
Space
Space
Replication Termination ActivityReplication Termination Activity
The consequence of these different conformations is most prominent in the position of the B1 sheet. This is evident in the Tyr33 residue, Space, which contact DNA only in the wing-down conformation.
TusTus
|
RoleRole
Tus is the 36 kDa protein responsible for termination of replication in Escherichia coli. The chromosome of E. coli contains a set of six polar Ter DNA sequences arranged such that three with the same directionality are located on either half of the chromosome. This generates what is termed a replication-fork trap, which prevents replication from occurring towards the origin. The Ter sites contain a 20 bp consensus element to which a monomer of Termination Utilisation Substance (Tus) binds to form a polar DNA-protein complex which halts the progression of the replicative machinery from one direction only. The fork arrest mechanism depends on the blocking of the helicase activity of DnaB, which is the first component of the replisome to encounter the Ter-Tus complex.
Space
Space
Space
Structural OverviewStructural Overview
The structure of the Tus protein was determined in complex with TerA by Kamada et al., and shown to be a previously undescribed backbone conformation (.). It is divided into two domains (amino and carboxy), in which α-helical regions of each are spanned by a central β-sandwich which contacts 13 bp of DNA duplex (#Indicate domains). Three helices within the amino domain (αI αII, αIII) form an antiparallel bundle aligned parallel to the DNA (#Helix bundle). Another two helices (αIV, αV) clamp the DNA phosphate backbone at the non-permissive end, and forms the cytosine-specific pocket containing the crucial residues for anti-helicase activity (#Phosphate clamp). The main DNA-binding domain however is the exposed side of the double β sheet layer which provides several base-specific interactions. This lies within the major groove and causes a conformational change in the DNA involving a deepening of the major groove, and an expansion of the minor one (#Sheet position).
space
space
space
DNA BindingDNA Binding
Tus is among the most stable monomeric, sequence-specific, double-stranded DNA-binding proteins. Three major sets of interactions contribute to this; (1) the phosphate clamp within the amino domain, (2) base-specific polar interactions by the β-sheet within the major groove, and (3) non-polar contacts within the carboxy domain.
1. Interaction between beta sheets (shown in green) and the major groove of DNA ().
Replication Termination ActivityReplication Termination Activity
Tus binds to a conserved cytosine residue which is not base paired . The interactions between residues of the Tus protein and this unpaired cytosine nucleotide are shown in more detail .
Its ability to do this depends on the conserved glutamate residue E49. "The crystal structure of the Tus-Ter lock shows that Glu49 of Tus makes a water-mediated hydrogen bond with the 50- phosphate of the displaced A(7) nucleotide residue, and it would thus be expected to be partially defective in formation of the locked species." This is shown
E49K does not affect DNA binding but does affect anti-helicase activity in the ‘trapped’ complex E49 makes an indirect hydrogen bond to the phosphate of the ‘displaced’ nucleotide.
The HistoryThe History
Summary of progression of understanding.