7ufm: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Structural highlights == | == Structural highlights == | ||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[7ufm]] is a 16 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrio_cholerae Vibrio cholerae] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_construct Synthetic construct]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=7UFM OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=7UFM FirstGlance]. <br> | <table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[7ufm]] is a 16 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibrio_cholerae Vibrio cholerae] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_construct Synthetic construct]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=7UFM OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=7UFM FirstGlance]. <br> | ||
</td></tr><tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=ATP:ADENOSINE-5-TRIPHOSPHATE'>ATP</scene></td></tr> | </td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">Electron Microscopy, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 3.9Å</td></tr> | ||
<tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=ATP:ADENOSINE-5-TRIPHOSPHATE'>ATP</scene></td></tr> | |||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=7ufm FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=7ufm OCA], [https://pdbe.org/7ufm PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=7ufm RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/7ufm PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=7ufm ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | <tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=7ufm FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=7ufm OCA], [https://pdbe.org/7ufm PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=7ufm RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/7ufm PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=7ufm ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
Bacterial transposons are pervasive mobile genetic elements that use distinct DNA-binding proteins for horizontal transmission. For example, Escherichia coli Tn7 homes to a specific attachment site using TnsD(1), whereas CRISPR-associated transposons use type I or type V Cas effectors to insert downstream of target sites specified by guide RNAs(2,3). Despite this targeting diversity, transposition invariably requires TnsB, a DDE-family transposase that catalyses DNA excision and insertion, and TnsC, a AAA+ ATPase that is thought to communicate between transposase and targeting proteins(4). How TnsC mediates this communication and thereby regulates transposition fidelity has remained unclear. Here we use chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing to monitor in vivo formation of the type I-F RNA-guided transpososome, enabling us to resolve distinct protein recruitment events before integration. DNA targeting by the TniQ-Cascade complex is surprisingly promiscuous-hundreds of genomic off-target sites are sampled, but only a subset of those sites is licensed for TnsC and TnsB recruitment, revealing a crucial proofreading checkpoint. To advance the mechanistic understanding of interactions responsible for transpososome assembly, we determined structures of TnsC using cryogenic electron microscopy and found that ATP binding drives the formation of heptameric rings that thread DNA through the central pore, thereby positioning the substrate for downstream integration. Collectively, our results highlight the molecular specificity imparted by consecutive factor binding to genomic target sites during RNA-guided transposition, and provide a structural roadmap to guide future engineering efforts. | Bacterial transposons are pervasive mobile genetic elements that use distinct DNA-binding proteins for horizontal transmission. For example, Escherichia coli Tn7 homes to a specific attachment site using TnsD(1), whereas CRISPR-associated transposons use type I or type V Cas effectors to insert downstream of target sites specified by guide RNAs(2,3). Despite this targeting diversity, transposition invariably requires TnsB, a DDE-family transposase that catalyses DNA excision and insertion, and TnsC, a AAA+ ATPase that is thought to communicate between transposase and targeting proteins(4). How TnsC mediates this communication and thereby regulates transposition fidelity has remained unclear. Here we use chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing to monitor in vivo formation of the type I-F RNA-guided transpososome, enabling us to resolve distinct protein recruitment events before integration. DNA targeting by the TniQ-Cascade complex is surprisingly promiscuous-hundreds of genomic off-target sites are sampled, but only a subset of those sites is licensed for TnsC and TnsB recruitment, revealing a crucial proofreading checkpoint. To advance the mechanistic understanding of interactions responsible for transpososome assembly, we determined structures of TnsC using cryogenic electron microscopy and found that ATP binding drives the formation of heptameric rings that thread DNA through the central pore, thereby positioning the substrate for downstream integration. Collectively, our results highlight the molecular specificity imparted by consecutive factor binding to genomic target sites during RNA-guided transposition, and provide a structural roadmap to guide future engineering efforts. | ||
Selective TnsC recruitment enhances the fidelity of RNA-guided transposition.,Hoffmann FT, Kim M, Beh LY, Wang J, Vo PLH, Gelsinger DR, George JT, Acree C, Mohabir JT, Fernandez IS, Sternberg SH Nature. 2022 | Selective TnsC recruitment enhances the fidelity of RNA-guided transposition.,Hoffmann FT, Kim M, Beh LY, Wang J, Vo PLH, Gelsinger DR, George JT, Acree C, Mohabir JT, Fernandez IS, Sternberg SH Nature. 2022 Sep;609(7926):384-393. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05059-4. Epub 2022 , Aug 24. PMID:36002573<ref>PMID:36002573</ref> | ||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | ||