1cqu: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
</jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=1cqu ConSurf]. | </jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=1cqu ConSurf]. | ||
<div style="clear:both"></div> | <div style="clear:both"></div> | ||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | |||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | |||
The N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 forms a split betaalphabeta structure with a long C-terminal helix. The folding transitions of a 56 residue version of this protein have previously been characterized, here we report the results of a study of a truncation mutant corresponding to residues 1-51. The 51 residue protein adopts the same fold as the 56 residue protein as judged by CD and two-dimensional NMR, but it is less stable as judged by chemical and thermal denaturation experiments. Studies with synthetic peptides demonstrate that the C-terminal helix of the 51 residue version has very little propensity to fold in isolation in contrast to the C-terminal helix of the 56 residue variant. The folding rates of the two proteins, as measured by stopped-flow fluorescence, are essentially identical, indicating that formation of local structure in the C-terminal helix is not involved in the rate-limiting step of folding. | |||
Effects of varying the local propensity to form secondary structure on the stability and folding kinetics of a rapid folding mixed alpha/beta protein: characterization of a truncation mutant of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9.,Luisi DL, Kuhlman B, Sideras K, Evans PA, Raleigh DP J Mol Biol. 1999 May 28;289(1):167-74. PMID:10339414<ref>PMID:10339414</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pdbe-citations 1cqu" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
*[[Ribosomal protein L9|Ribosomal protein L9]] | *[[Ribosomal protein L9|Ribosomal protein L9]] | ||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:22, 22 May 2024
SOLUTION STRUCTURE OF THE N-TERMINAL DOMAIN OF RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L9SOLUTION STRUCTURE OF THE N-TERMINAL DOMAIN OF RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L9
Structural highlights
FunctionRL9_GEOSE Binds to the 23S rRNA. Evolutionary Conservation Check, as determined by ConSurfDB. You may read the explanation of the method and the full data available from ConSurf. Publication Abstract from PubMedThe N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 forms a split betaalphabeta structure with a long C-terminal helix. The folding transitions of a 56 residue version of this protein have previously been characterized, here we report the results of a study of a truncation mutant corresponding to residues 1-51. The 51 residue protein adopts the same fold as the 56 residue protein as judged by CD and two-dimensional NMR, but it is less stable as judged by chemical and thermal denaturation experiments. Studies with synthetic peptides demonstrate that the C-terminal helix of the 51 residue version has very little propensity to fold in isolation in contrast to the C-terminal helix of the 56 residue variant. The folding rates of the two proteins, as measured by stopped-flow fluorescence, are essentially identical, indicating that formation of local structure in the C-terminal helix is not involved in the rate-limiting step of folding. Effects of varying the local propensity to form secondary structure on the stability and folding kinetics of a rapid folding mixed alpha/beta protein: characterization of a truncation mutant of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9.,Luisi DL, Kuhlman B, Sideras K, Evans PA, Raleigh DP J Mol Biol. 1999 May 28;289(1):167-74. PMID:10339414[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. See AlsoReferences
|
| ||||||||||||||||