The BioMolViz Project: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:


== Framework Overarching Themes ==
== Framework Overarching Themes ==
 
<StructureSection load='' size='450' side='right' caption='One of the 12 overarching themes is MI, molecular interactions, illustrated here by the lambda repressor bound to the major grooves of double-stranded DNA' scene='85/857774/Molecularinteraction/1'>
The twelve overarching themes of the Framework are outlined below, and the associated learning goals and objectives, can be viewed on the [https://biomolviz.org/framework/ BioMolViz website].  
The twelve overarching themes of the Framework are outlined below, and the associated learning goals and objectives, can be viewed on the [https://biomolviz.org/framework/ BioMolViz website].  


'''[[:Category:Atomic Geometry|Atomic Geometry (AG)]]''' ‐ three‐atom and four‐atom dihedral/torsion angles, metal size and metal‐ligand geometries, steric clashes.  
'''[[:Category:Atomic Geometry|Atomic Geometry (AG)]]''' ‐ three‐atom and four‐atom dihedral/torsion angles, metal size and metal‐ligand geometries, steric clashes. As an example, <scene name='85/857774/Glucose/1'>a ring form of D-glucose (ß-D-glucopyanose) </scene> is shown. A C-O-C bond angle in the sugar ring is shown, in addition to the dihedral/torsion angle of the center bond defined by four consecutive ring atoms (C-C-C-O). Viewers should be able to differentiate bond angles from dihedral/torsion angles and predict changes from ideal angles. An example assessment that encompasses objectives AG1.02, AG1.03, and AG1.04 would require students to measure the C-O-C bond angle, recognize that the ideal tetrahedral bond angle geometry is 109.5º and describe this deviation due to the chair conformation of the structure. An assessment that encompasses AG3.03 would require students to display and describe the atoms involved in measuring the dihedral angle.


'''[[:Category:Alternate Renderings|Alternate Renderings (AR)]]''' ‐ Rendering of a macromolecular structure such as a protein or nucleic acid structure in various ways from the simplest possible way (connections between alpha carbons) to illustration of secondary structure (ribbons) to surface rendering and space filling.
'''[[:Category:Alternate Renderings|Alternate Renderings (AR)]]''' ‐ Rendering of a macromolecular structure such as a protein or nucleic acid structure in various ways from the simplest possible way (connections between alpha carbons) to illustration of secondary structure (ribbons) to surface rendering and space filling.
Line 36: Line 36:


'''[[:Category:Topology and Connectivity|Topology and Connectivity (TC)]]''' ‐ Following the chain direction through the molecule, translating between 2D topology mapping and 3D rendering.
'''[[:Category:Topology and Connectivity|Topology and Connectivity (TC)]]''' ‐ Following the chain direction through the molecule, translating between 2D topology mapping and 3D rendering.
</StructureSection>


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 00:19, 18 December 2020

Project OverviewProject Overview

The BioMolViz Framework is a guide for biomolecular visualization (BMV) instruction. Designed and amended by teams of biochemistry and molecular biology instructors, the Framework divides visual literacy into 12 Overarching Themes. Each theme is subdivided into several broad learning goals, which are further partitioned into a series of specific learning objectives. The objectives describe discrete tasks for the BMV learner to accomplish. By considering the Overarching Theme, learning goals, and objectives, instructors can create BMV assessments using backward design, considering their course aims in the design process. Likewise, the BMV learner can utilize the Framework to guide their own learning by exploring the BMV topics and skills instructors consider key for development of visual literacy.

Rationale: Deliberate Visual Literacy InstructionRationale: Deliberate Visual Literacy Instruction

Biochemistry and molecular biology instructors frequently use images in their instruction, and some incorporate biomolecular visualization tools and software. However, the most common classroom use of BMV is exposure, not explicit instruction how to use the images (e.g. choosing a representation, manipulating a structure for presentation, or thinking about how that structure may be used in a biological context). As instructors guide students through the process of evaluating images and effectively creating them, they will need assessments to evaluate their instructional techniques.

The Framework provides a basis for the design of such assessments, and BioMolViz workshops facilitate team-driven crafting of these tools. The assessments that are in development will be validated by teams of experts, and made widely available for instructors to use.

Framework Overarching ThemesFramework Overarching Themes

The twelve overarching themes of the Framework are outlined below, and the associated learning goals and objectives, can be viewed on the BioMolViz website.

Atomic Geometry (AG) ‐ three‐atom and four‐atom dihedral/torsion angles, metal size and metal‐ligand geometries, steric clashes. As an example, is shown. A C-O-C bond angle in the sugar ring is shown, in addition to the dihedral/torsion angle of the center bond defined by four consecutive ring atoms (C-C-C-O). Viewers should be able to differentiate bond angles from dihedral/torsion angles and predict changes from ideal angles. An example assessment that encompasses objectives AG1.02, AG1.03, and AG1.04 would require students to measure the C-O-C bond angle, recognize that the ideal tetrahedral bond angle geometry is 109.5º and describe this deviation due to the chair conformation of the structure. An assessment that encompasses AG3.03 would require students to display and describe the atoms involved in measuring the dihedral angle.

Alternate Renderings (AR) ‐ Rendering of a macromolecular structure such as a protein or nucleic acid structure in various ways from the simplest possible way (connections between alpha carbons) to illustration of secondary structure (ribbons) to surface rendering and space filling.

Construction and Annotation (CA) ‐ Ability to build macromolecular models, either physical or computerized, and, where possible, add commentary, either written or verbal, to tell a molecular story.

Ligands and Modifications (LM) ‐ Metals and metal clusters, additions such as glycosylation, phosphorylation, lipid attachment, methylation etc.

Macromolecular Assemblies (MA) ‐ Polypeptides, oligosaccharides, and nucleic acid and lipid superstructures.

Macromolecular Building Blocks (MB) ‐ Recognition of native amino acids, nucleotides, sugars, and other biomonomer units/building blocks. Understanding of their physical and chemical properties, particularly regarding functional groups.

Molecular Dynamics (MD) ‐ Animated motion simulating conformational changes involved in ligand binding or catalysis, or other molecular motion/dynamics.

Molecular Interactions (MI) ‐ Covalent and noncovalent bonding governing ligand binding and subunit‐subunit interactions.

Symmetry/Asymmetry Recognition (SA) ‐ Recognition of symmetry elements within both single chain and oligomeric macromolecules.

Structure‐Function Relationship (SF) ‐ Active/binding sites, microenvironments, nucleophiles, redox centers, etc.

Structural Model Skepticism (SK) ‐ Recognition of the limitations of models to describe the structure of macromolecules.

Topology and Connectivity (TC) ‐ Following the chain direction through the molecule, translating between 2D topology mapping and 3D rendering.


One of the 12 overarching themes is MI, molecular interactions, illustrated here by the lambda repressor bound to the major grooves of double-stranded DNA

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

ReferencesReferences

Bateman, Robert C., and Paul A. Craig. 2010. “Education Corner: A Proficiency Rubric for Biomacromolecular 3D Literacy.” PDB Newsletter 45: 5–7.

Dries, Daniel R., Diane M. Dean, Laura L. Listenberger, Walter R.P. Novak, Margaret A. Franzen, and Paul A. Craig. 2016. “An Expanded Framework for Biomolecular Visualization in the Classroom: Learning Goals and Competencies.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20991.

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Kristen Procko, Josh Beckham, Jaime Prilusky, Karsten Theis