JSmol/Rotation Speeds: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:


*Windows (JSmol, no Java):
*Windows (JSmol, no Java):
**Firefox and Chrome perform similarly. (Cartoon rotation: Chrome outpeforms Firefox, about 2x more frames/second. Spacefill rotation: Firefox outperforms Chrome.)
**Firefox and Chrome perform similarly. (Cartoon rotation: Chrome outpeforms Firefox, about 2x more frames/second. Spacefill rotation: Firefox outperforms Chrome also about 2x.)
**Chrome: Rotation by mouse was as good as in Firefox. Spinning was jerkier than Firefox by about two-fold.
**Edge: NOT RECOMMENDED. Very sluggish. Spinning and rotation by mouse are very jerky.
**Edge: NOT RECOMMENDED. Very sluggish. Spinning and rotation by mouse are very jerky.
**Internet Explorer: UNACCEPTABLE, extremely sluggish, with spining/rotation extremely slow and jerky.
**Internet Explorer: UNACCEPTABLE, extremely sluggish, with spining/rotation extremely slow and jerky.

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Eric Martz