4x1u: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | <div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | ||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | == Publication Abstract from PubMed == | ||
In many established methods, identification of hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) is primarily based on pairwise comparison of distances between atoms. These methods often give rise to systematic errors when sulfur is involved. A more accurate method is the non-covalent interaction index, which determines the strength of the H-bonds based on the associated electron density and its gradient. We applied the NCI index on the active site of a single-cysteine peroxiredoxin. We found a different sulfur hydrogen-bonding network to that typically found by established methods, and we propose a more accurate equation for determining sulfur H-bonds based on geometrical criteria. This new algorithm will be implemented in the next release of the widely-used CHARMM program (version 41b), and will be particularly useful for analyzing water molecule-mediated H-bonds involving different atom types. Furthermore, based on the identification of the weakest sulfur-water H-bond, the location of hydrogen peroxide for the nucleophilic attack by the cysteine sulfur can be predicted. In general, current methods to determine H-bonds will need to be reevaluated, thereby leading to better understanding of the catalytic mechanisms in which sulfur chemistry is involved. | |||
Revisiting sulfur H-bonds in proteins: The example of peroxiredoxin AhpE.,van Bergen LA, Alonso M, Pallo A, Nilsson L, De Proft F, Messens J Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 29;6:30369. doi: 10.1038/srep30369. PMID:27468924<ref>PMID:27468924</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> |
Revision as of 11:28, 10 August 2016
The structure of AhpE from Mycobacterium tuberculosis revisitedThe structure of AhpE from Mycobacterium tuberculosis revisited
Structural highlights
Publication Abstract from PubMedIn many established methods, identification of hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) is primarily based on pairwise comparison of distances between atoms. These methods often give rise to systematic errors when sulfur is involved. A more accurate method is the non-covalent interaction index, which determines the strength of the H-bonds based on the associated electron density and its gradient. We applied the NCI index on the active site of a single-cysteine peroxiredoxin. We found a different sulfur hydrogen-bonding network to that typically found by established methods, and we propose a more accurate equation for determining sulfur H-bonds based on geometrical criteria. This new algorithm will be implemented in the next release of the widely-used CHARMM program (version 41b), and will be particularly useful for analyzing water molecule-mediated H-bonds involving different atom types. Furthermore, based on the identification of the weakest sulfur-water H-bond, the location of hydrogen peroxide for the nucleophilic attack by the cysteine sulfur can be predicted. In general, current methods to determine H-bonds will need to be reevaluated, thereby leading to better understanding of the catalytic mechanisms in which sulfur chemistry is involved. Revisiting sulfur H-bonds in proteins: The example of peroxiredoxin AhpE.,van Bergen LA, Alonso M, Pallo A, Nilsson L, De Proft F, Messens J Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 29;6:30369. doi: 10.1038/srep30369. PMID:27468924[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. References
|
|