1gb2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|PDB= 1gb2 |SIZE=350|CAPTION= <scene name='initialview01'>1gb2</scene>, resolution 1.8Å | |PDB= 1gb2 |SIZE=350|CAPTION= <scene name='initialview01'>1gb2</scene>, resolution 1.8Å | ||
|SITE= | |SITE= | ||
|LIGAND= <scene name='pdbligand=NA:SODIUM ION'>NA</scene> | |LIGAND= <scene name='pdbligand=NA:SODIUM+ION'>NA</scene> | ||
|ACTIVITY= [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysozyme Lysozyme], with EC number [http://www.brenda-enzymes.info/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=3.2.1.17 3.2.1.17] | |ACTIVITY= <span class='plainlinks'>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysozyme Lysozyme], with EC number [http://www.brenda-enzymes.info/php/result_flat.php4?ecno=3.2.1.17 3.2.1.17] </span> | ||
|GENE= | |GENE= | ||
|DOMAIN= | |||
|RELATEDENTRY=[[1mei|1MEI]], [[1gay|1GAY]], [[1gaz|1GAZ]], [[1gb0|1GB0]], [[1gb3|1GB3]], [[1gb5|1GB5]], [[1gb6|1GB6]], [[1gb7|1GB7]], [[1gb8|1GB8]], [[1gb9|1GB9]], [[1gbo|1GBO]], [[1gbw|1GBW]], [[1gbx|1GBX]], [[1gby|1GBY]], [[1gbz|1GBZ]] | |||
|RESOURCES=<span class='plainlinks'>[http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-docs/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1gb2 FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=1gb2 OCA], [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/1gb2 PDBsum], [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1gb2 RCSB]</span> | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 17: | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
To evaluate the contribution of the amino acid residues on the surface of a protein to its stability, a series of hydrophobic mutant human lysozymes (Val to Gly, Ala, Leu, Ile, Met, and Phe) modified at three different positions on the surface, which are located in the alpha-helix (Val 110), the beta-sheet (Val 2), and the loop (Val 74), were constructed. Their thermodynamic parameters of denaturation and crystal structures were examined by calorimetry and by X-ray crystallography at 100 K, respectively. Differences in the denaturation Gibbs energy change between the wild-type and the hydrophobic mutant proteins ranged from 4.6 to -9.6 kJ/mol, 2.7 to -1.5 kJ/mol, and 3.6 to -0.2 kJ/mol at positions 2, 74, and 110, respectively. The identical substitution at different positions and different substitutions at the same position resulted in different degrees of stabilization. Changes in the stability of the mutant proteins could be evaluated by a unique equation considering the conformational changes due to the substitutions [Funahashi et al. (1999) Protein Eng. 12, 841-850]. For this calculation, secondary structural propensities were newly considered. However, some mutant proteins were not adapted to the equation. The hydration structures around the mutation sites of the exceptional mutant proteins were affected due to the substitutions. The stability changes in the exceptional mutant proteins could be explained by the formation or destruction of the hydration structures. These results suggest that the hydration structure mediated via hydrogen bonds covering the protein surface plays an important role in the conformational stability of the protein. | To evaluate the contribution of the amino acid residues on the surface of a protein to its stability, a series of hydrophobic mutant human lysozymes (Val to Gly, Ala, Leu, Ile, Met, and Phe) modified at three different positions on the surface, which are located in the alpha-helix (Val 110), the beta-sheet (Val 2), and the loop (Val 74), were constructed. Their thermodynamic parameters of denaturation and crystal structures were examined by calorimetry and by X-ray crystallography at 100 K, respectively. Differences in the denaturation Gibbs energy change between the wild-type and the hydrophobic mutant proteins ranged from 4.6 to -9.6 kJ/mol, 2.7 to -1.5 kJ/mol, and 3.6 to -0.2 kJ/mol at positions 2, 74, and 110, respectively. The identical substitution at different positions and different substitutions at the same position resulted in different degrees of stabilization. Changes in the stability of the mutant proteins could be evaluated by a unique equation considering the conformational changes due to the substitutions [Funahashi et al. (1999) Protein Eng. 12, 841-850]. For this calculation, secondary structural propensities were newly considered. However, some mutant proteins were not adapted to the equation. The hydration structures around the mutation sites of the exceptional mutant proteins were affected due to the substitutions. The stability changes in the exceptional mutant proteins could be explained by the formation or destruction of the hydration structures. These results suggest that the hydration structure mediated via hydrogen bonds covering the protein surface plays an important role in the conformational stability of the protein. | ||
==About this Structure== | ==About this Structure== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
[[Category: Yamagata, Y.]] | [[Category: Yamagata, Y.]] | ||
[[Category: Yutani, K.]] | [[Category: Yutani, K.]] | ||
[[Category: surface mutant]] | [[Category: surface mutant]] | ||
''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on | ''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Sun Mar 30 20:40:29 2008'' | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 30 March 2008
| |||||||
| , resolution 1.8Å | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ligands: | |||||||
| Activity: | Lysozyme, with EC number 3.2.1.17 | ||||||
| Related: | 1MEI, 1GAY, 1GAZ, 1GB0, 1GB3, 1GB5, 1GB6, 1GB7, 1GB8, 1GB9, 1GBO, 1GBW, 1GBX, 1GBY, 1GBZ
| ||||||
| Resources: | FirstGlance, OCA, PDBsum, RCSB | ||||||
| Coordinates: | save as pdb, mmCIF, xml | ||||||
CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF MUTANT HUMAN LYSOZYME SUBSTITUTED AT THE SURFACE POSITIONS
OverviewOverview
To evaluate the contribution of the amino acid residues on the surface of a protein to its stability, a series of hydrophobic mutant human lysozymes (Val to Gly, Ala, Leu, Ile, Met, and Phe) modified at three different positions on the surface, which are located in the alpha-helix (Val 110), the beta-sheet (Val 2), and the loop (Val 74), were constructed. Their thermodynamic parameters of denaturation and crystal structures were examined by calorimetry and by X-ray crystallography at 100 K, respectively. Differences in the denaturation Gibbs energy change between the wild-type and the hydrophobic mutant proteins ranged from 4.6 to -9.6 kJ/mol, 2.7 to -1.5 kJ/mol, and 3.6 to -0.2 kJ/mol at positions 2, 74, and 110, respectively. The identical substitution at different positions and different substitutions at the same position resulted in different degrees of stabilization. Changes in the stability of the mutant proteins could be evaluated by a unique equation considering the conformational changes due to the substitutions [Funahashi et al. (1999) Protein Eng. 12, 841-850]. For this calculation, secondary structural propensities were newly considered. However, some mutant proteins were not adapted to the equation. The hydration structures around the mutation sites of the exceptional mutant proteins were affected due to the substitutions. The stability changes in the exceptional mutant proteins could be explained by the formation or destruction of the hydration structures. These results suggest that the hydration structure mediated via hydrogen bonds covering the protein surface plays an important role in the conformational stability of the protein.
About this StructureAbout this Structure
1GB2 is a Single protein structure of sequence from Homo sapiens. Full crystallographic information is available from OCA.
ReferenceReference
Role of surface hydrophobic residues in the conformational stability of human lysozyme at three different positions., Funahashi J, Takano K, Yamagata Y, Yutani K, Biochemistry. 2000 Nov 28;39(47):14448-56. PMID:11087397
Page seeded by OCA on Sun Mar 30 20:40:29 2008