JSmol/Rotation Speeds: Difference between revisions
Eric Martz (talk | contribs) |
Eric Martz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Edge''' (the new browser in Windows 10) is almost '''4-fold slower''' than Firefox for both cartoon and spacefilled renderings. | *'''Edge''' (the new browser in Windows 10) is almost '''4-fold slower''' than Firefox for both cartoon and spacefilled renderings. | ||
*'''Internet Explorer 11''' gives '''unacceptably slow''' rotation of molecules in JSmol, with a performance about 9-fold slower than that of Firefox. | *'''Internet Explorer 11''' gives '''unacceptably slow''' rotation of molecules in JSmol, with a performance about '''9-fold slower''' than that of Firefox. | ||
::<small>Historical note: In 2014, Chrome outperformed Firefox. Changes in Chrome in 2015 reduced its performance for rotating molecules in JSmol. In December, 2015, a change in Chrome (first in version 47) made it unable to rotate molecules in JSmol satisfactorily. As the mouse moved, the molecule remained fixed until the mouse movement stopped, whereupon the molecule jumped to the final position in one step. Bob Hanson was able to work around the change in Chrome with a modification to JSmol, but frames/second are still poorer than they were in Chrome in 2014.</small> | ::<small>Historical note: In 2014, Chrome outperformed Firefox. Changes in Chrome in 2015 reduced its performance for rotating molecules in JSmol. In December, 2015, a change in Chrome (first in version 47) made it unable to rotate molecules in JSmol satisfactorily. As the mouse moved, the molecule remained fixed until the mouse movement stopped, whereupon the molecule jumped to the final position in one step. Bob Hanson was able to work around the change in Chrome with a modification to JSmol, but frames/second are still poorer than they were in Chrome in 2014.</small> | ||
*<font | |||
==Data (December, 2015)== | ==Data (December, 2015)== | ||