JSmol/Rotation Speeds: Difference between revisions

Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
'''Firefox''' outperforms all other popular browsers for smoothness and speed of rotation, and is therefore the '''recommended''' browser for websites that use JSmol such as Proteopedia and [[FirstGlance in Jmol]].
'''Firefox''' outperforms all other popular browsers for smoothness and speed of rotation, and is therefore the '''recommended''' browser for websites that use JSmol such as Proteopedia and [[FirstGlance in Jmol]].


Firefox rotates molecules in JSmol about twice as smoothly as Chrome, Edge, or Opera
'''Chrome, Edge''' and '''Opera''' rotate molecules in JSmol about half as smoothly as Firefox. That is, they generate about half the number of frames/second as Firefox, so their performance is two-fold slower.
 
'''Internet Explorer 11''' has unacceptably slow rotation of molecules in JSmol, with a performance about one-fifth that of Firefox.


==Data==
==Data==

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Eric Martz