Talk:Fasciculin: Difference between revisions
New page: Dear Proteopedikers, Fasciculin variants require Arabic numerals (i.e., fasciculin 1, 2, 3 or Fas1, Fas2, Fas3), not Roman numerals (FasI, FasII, FasIII). Reason #1 is that this is the w... |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Dear | Dear Proteopedia fellows and fasciculin users, | ||
Please note that fasciculin variants require Arabic numerals (i.e., fasciculin 1, 2, 3 or Fas1, Fas2, Fas3), not Roman numerals (FasI, FasII, FasIII). | |||
Reason #1 is that this is the way they were named by their finders | Reason #1 is that this is the way they were named and numbered by their finders, so why should we change this? | ||
Reason #2 is that the choice of Arabic versus Roman numerals when naming a peptidic toxin is not only based on the godfather's choice but | Reason #2 is that the choice of Arabic versus Roman numerals when naming a peptidic toxin is not only based on the godfather's choice but also relates to a code shared by toxinologists during the previous century. Indeed, in these old times the first step of toxin purification from a whole venom involved gel filtration, leading to rough fractions numbered with Roman numerals, then ion exchange chromatography, leading to fractions numbered with Arabic numerals. For those cases where a third step was required, lower-case letters could be added after the Arabic numerals. | ||
This code might sound out of date now that more sophisticated means like HPLC etc are used for toxin purification. Yet, simply from their names, a toxinologist knows that fasciculins Fas1 and Fas2, which were purified from the same venom 3 decades ago, were separated from each other by ion exchange chromatography... |