Non-polymerizable monomeric actin: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{STRUCTURE_2hf4| PDB=2hf4 | SCENE=User:Thomas_E_Sladewski/Sandbox_1/2hf4_blue_helix2/1|CAPTION= Crystal structure of the AP-actin in complex with ATP,  [[2HF4]]. Alpha helices are in green. Loops and beta strands are in blue. ATP is designated with gold spheres and Ca+2 ions in red spheres.  }}  
{{STRUCTURE_2hf4| PDB=2hf4 | SCENE=User:Thomas_E_Sladewski/Sandbox_1/2hf4_blue_helix2/1|CAPTION= Crystal structure of the AP-actin in complex with ATP,  (PDB entry [[2HF4]]). Alpha helices are in green. Loops and beta strands are in blue. ATP is designated with gold spheres and Ca+2 ions in red spheres.  }}  




Non-polymerizable monomeric actin or AP-actin is an Sf9-expressed cytoplasmic actin harboring two point mutations that prevent the monomer from polymerizing into actin filaments. These mutations allow for the crystallization of actin without the use of specific toxins or actin-binding proteins that may influence the structure. The crystal structure of AP-actin has been solved for the ADP-bound form ([[2HF3]]) and the ATP-bound form ([[2HF4]])<ref>PMID: 16920713</ref>. These two structures are shown below as a morph between the two states.
Non-polymerizable monomeric actin or AP-actin is an Sf9-expressed cytoplasmic actin harboring two point mutations that prevent the monomer from polymerizing into actin filaments. These mutations allow for the crystallization of actin without the use of specific toxins or actin-binding proteins that may influence the structure. The crystal structure of AP-actin has been solved for the ADP-bound form (PDB entry [[2HF3]]) and the ATP-bound form ([[2HF4]])<ref>PMID: 16920713</ref>. These two structures are shown below as a morph between the two states.


===Structural features of actin===
===Structural features of actin===
Line 16: Line 16:




<table width='450' align='left' cellpadding='5'><tr><td rowspan='2'>&nbsp;</td><td bgcolor='#d0d0d0'><applet load=Image:2HF3 2HF4 10state morph4.pdb' size='450' align='right' scene='User:Thomas_E_Sladewski/Sandbox_1/10state_morph_scene2/2' /></td></tr><tr><td bgcolor='#d0d0d0'>Morph of AP-actin showing conformational changes between actin bound to ATP ([[2HF4]]) and ADP ([[2HF3]]). Nucleotide is not shown.</td></tr></table>
<table width='450' align='left' cellpadding='5'><tr><td rowspan='2'>&nbsp;</td><td bgcolor='#d0d0d0'><applet load=Image:2HF3 2HF4 10state morph4.pdb' size='450' align='right' scene='User:Thomas_E_Sladewski/Sandbox_1/10state_morph_scene2/2' /></td></tr><tr><td bgcolor='#d0d0d0'>Morph of AP-actin showing conformational changes between actin bound to ATP (PDB entry [[2HF4]]) and ADP (PDB entry [[2HF3]]). Nucleotide is not shown.</td></tr></table>


[[Image:2HF4 REDO OF MORPH STILL IMAGE.png|300px|right|thumb| Sensor loop of AP-actin bound to ADP (grey) and ATP (white)]]
[[Image:2HF4 REDO OF MORPH STILL IMAGE.png|300px|right|thumb| Sensor loop of AP-actin bound to ADP (grey) and ATP (white)]]
Line 25: Line 25:




[[Image:2hf4 d loop crystal packing.png|250px|left|thumb| Crystal packing interactions between ADP-bound AP-actin, 2HF3, (grey ribbon) and neighboring residues in subdomain 2 of an adjacent monomer in the crystal within 15 angstroms of the D-loop in the unit cell (blue ribbons). Residues 39-50 are shown in red.]]
[[Image:2hf4 d loop crystal packing.png|250px|left|thumb| Crystal packing interactions between ADP-bound AP-actin, (grey ribbon) and neighboring residues in subdomain 2 of an adjacent monomer in the crystal within 15 angstroms of the D-loop in the unit cell (blue ribbons). Residues 39-50 are shown in red.]]
[[Image:1J6Z d loop crystal packing.png|250px|left|thumb| Crystal packing interactions between ADP-actin, 1J6Z, complexed with TMR (grey ribbon) and neighboring residues in subdomain 2 of an adjacent monomer in the crystal within 15 angstroms of the D-loop in the unit cell (blue ribbons). Residues 39-50 are shown in red.]]
[[Image:1J6Z d loop crystal packing.png|250px|left|thumb| Crystal packing interactions between ADP-actin, complexed with TMR (grey ribbon)(PDB entry [[1J6Z]]) and neighboring residues in subdomain 2 of an adjacent monomer in the crystal within 15 angstroms of the D-loop in the unit cell (blue ribbons). Residues 39-50 are shown in red.]]




Line 35: Line 35:
===The D-loop===
===The D-loop===


There is some controversy over whether or not the D-loop undergoes structural changes upon actin binding ATP. In the structure of AP-actin, the D-loop is disordered in both the ATP and ADP-bound state. Also, there is no evidence that structural changes in the nucleotide binding cleft propagate to subdomain 2. This argues that the D-loop remains disordered in both states. However, other groups show large ATP-dependent structural changes in the D-loop<ref name="TMR">PMID:11474115</ref>. This is illustrated, right, in a subdomain 2 morph of actin complexed with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) in the ADP-bound state, [[1J6Z]] and actin complexed with DNAase I in the ATP-bound state, [[1ATN]]<ref name="TMR"/>. These structures revile that the D-loop is disordered when actin is bound to ATP, and transitions to an alpha-helix in the ADP-bound state. It has been suggested that the alpha helix in the ADP-bound state results from crystal packing. In support of this, actin complexed with TMR in the ADP state shows extensive neighboring contacts around the D-loop (shown left, lower panel). In contrast, AP-actin, [[2HF3]], shows far fewer crystal contacts around the D-loop (shown left, upper panel). These crystal contacts have been proposed to result in the nucleotide-dependent structural changes in the D-loop observed in some structures. In further support of this, the sequence of the D-loop, HQGVMVGMG, has a low propensity to form an alpha helix. However, molecular dynamic simulations show that the D-loop favors the alpha helix conformation in the ADP state, and not the ATP or ADP-Pi states. This study supports a model where small perturbations in the active site shift the equilibrium of the D-loop between the coil and helix state. Further studies are needed resolve these conflicting reports.  
There is some controversy over whether or not the D-loop undergoes structural changes upon actin binding ATP. In the structure of AP-actin, the D-loop is disordered in both the ATP and ADP-bound state. Also, there is no evidence that structural changes in the nucleotide binding cleft propagate to subdomain 2. This argues that the D-loop remains disordered in both states. However, other groups show large ATP-dependent structural changes in the D-loop<ref name="TMR">PMID:11474115</ref>. This is illustrated, right, in a subdomain 2 morph of actin complexed with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) in the ADP-bound state, (PDB entry [[1J6Z]]) and actin complexed with DNAase I in the ATP-bound state, (PDB entry [[1ATN]])<ref name="TMR"/>. These structures revile that the D-loop is disordered when actin is bound to ATP, and transitions to an alpha-helix in the ADP-bound state. It has been suggested that the alpha helix in the ADP-bound state results from crystal packing. In support of this, actin complexed with TMR in the ADP state shows extensive neighboring contacts around the D-loop (shown left, lower panel). In contrast, AP-actin, (PDB entry [[2HF3]]), shows far fewer crystal contacts around the D-loop (shown left, upper panel). These crystal contacts have been proposed to result in the nucleotide-dependent structural changes in the D-loop observed in some structures. In further support of this, the sequence of the D-loop, HQGVMVGMG, has a low propensity to form an alpha helix. However, molecular dynamic simulations show that the D-loop favors the alpha helix conformation in the ADP state, and not the ATP or ADP-Pi states. This study supports a model where small perturbations in the active site shift the equilibrium of the D-loop between the coil and helix state. Further studies are needed resolve these conflicting reports.  


   
   
Line 77: Line 77:
Two β-strands within the subdomain 3 β-sheet also form a β-hairpin (residues 150-166), shown left. The loop connecting the β-strands form the G-loop which contain residues in the nucleotide-binding cleft. These β-sheet structures are highly conserved in the actin superfamily and contain residues critical for nucleotide binding and catalysis.  
Two β-strands within the subdomain 3 β-sheet also form a β-hairpin (residues 150-166), shown left. The loop connecting the β-strands form the G-loop which contain residues in the nucleotide-binding cleft. These β-sheet structures are highly conserved in the actin superfamily and contain residues critical for nucleotide binding and catalysis.  


Residues 70-77 in subdomain 1 make up the H-loop. This loop is also known as the sensor loop because structural changes in the nucleotide binding cleft, such as tortional movement of serine 14, are propagated to these amino acids. Thus, the H-loop undergoes the largest nucleotide-dependent conformational changes as seen above. The H-loop is a good example of a type I’ β-turn, shown left. β-turns are comprised of four consecutive residues whose distance between the α-carbons of residue i and i+3 is less than 7 Å. Typically, β-turns form hydrogen bonds between the carboxyl group of residue i and the amide group of residue i+3. Here, the carbonyl of glutamic acid-72 (i) forms a hydrogen bond with the amide group of isoleucine 75 (i+3). In addition, another hydrogen bond is formed between the carbonyl of isoleucine 75 and the amide of glutamic acid 72, indicating a capping box motif. β-turns can be further classified by the dihedral angles of the i+1 and i+2 residues as well as the distance between the α-carbons of residue i and i+3. This turn is consistent with a type I’ β-turn.
Residues 70-77 in subdomain 1 make up the H-loop. This loop is also known as the sensor loop because structural changes in the nucleotide binding cleft, such as tortional movement of serine 14, are propagated to these amino acids. Thus, the H-loop undergoes the largest nucleotide-dependent conformational changes as seen above. The H-loop is a good example of a type I’ β-turn, shown right. β-turns are comprised of four consecutive residues whose distance between the α-carbons of residue i and i+3 is less than 7 Å. Typically, β-turns form hydrogen bonds between the carboxyl group of residue i and the amide group of residue i+3. Here, the carbonyl of glutamic acid-72 (i) forms a hydrogen bond with the amide group of isoleucine 75 (i+3). In addition, another hydrogen bond is formed between the carbonyl of isoleucine 75 and the amide of glutamic acid 72, indicating a capping box motif. β-turns can be further classified by the dihedral angles of the i+1 and i+2 residues as well as the distance between the α-carbons of residue i and i+3. This turn is consistent with a type I’ β-turn.


Helix capping describes the interruption of hydrogen bonds between amide hydrogen’s and carbonyl oxygen’s at the termini of an α-helix. This occurs when amide hydrogen’s form hydrogen bonds with alternative binding partners such as side chains. A number of helix capping motifs have been described to form these alternative hydrogen bonding patterns. The N-terminus of α-helix eight (residues 202-217) in AP-actin is capped by a “capping box” motif. This motif caps two (threonine-202 and glutamic acid-205) of the initial four amide hydrogen donors in the helix, shown right. <ref name="Aurora">PMID: 9514257</ref>
Helix capping describes the interruption of hydrogen bonds between amide hydrogen’s and carbonyl oxygen’s at the termini of an α-helix. This occurs when amide hydrogen’s form hydrogen bonds with alternative binding partners such as side chains. A number of helix capping motifs have been described to form these alternative hydrogen bonding patterns. The N-terminus of α-helix eight (residues 202-217) in AP-actin is capped by a “capping box” motif. This motif caps two (threonine-202 and glutamic acid-205) of the initial four amide hydrogen donors in the helix, shown left. <ref name="Aurora">PMID: 9514257</ref>


Domain 1 in actin contains a helix-loop-helix motif (residues 333-357), shown right. The helices are interrupted by loop residues 346-352. The break in helicity appears to be due to two glutamates (Q353 and Q354) that hydrogen bind with the carbonyl carbons of adjacent residues in the helix (L349, A347 and T351). In addition to this, there appears to be a hydrophobic staple between residues L346 and F352 However, this doesn’t follow the i, i+5 rule that is normally seen with a hydrophobic staple.  
Domain 1 in actin contains a helix-loop-helix motif (residues 333-357), shown right. The helices are interrupted by loop residues 346-352. The break in helicity appears to be due to two glutamates (Q353 and Q354) that hydrogen bind with the carbonyl carbons of adjacent residues in the helix (L349, A347 and T351). In addition to this, there appears to be a hydrophobic staple between residues L346 and F352 However, this doesn’t follow the i, i+5 rule that is normally seen with a hydrophobic staple.  


Subomain 1 contains a right handed β-α-β motif (residues 103-136). Shown left, two parallel β-strands are linked by an α-helix. These β-strands are part of the β-sheet motif in subdomain 1.  
Subomain 1 contains a right handed β-α-β motif (residues 103-136). Shown left, two parallel β-strands are linked by an α-helix. These β-strands are part of the β-sheet motif in subdomain 1.  
==About this Structure==
This is where I will add my text. [[2hf4]] is a 1 chain structure of [[Actin]] with sequence from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drosophila_melanogaster Drosophila melanogaster]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=2HF4 OCA].


==See Also==
==See Also==

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Thomas E Sladewski, Michal Harel, Alexander Berchansky