Proteopedia:Guidelines for Ethical Writing: Difference between revisions
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
===Authorship=== | ===Authorship=== | ||
* Authorship determination should be discussed prior to commencing a research collaboration and should be based on established guidelines, such as those of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. | * Authorship determination should be discussed prior to commencing a research collaboration and should be based on established guidelines, such as those of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. | ||
* The office of research integrity states that "Only those individuals who have made substantitve contributions to a project merit authorship in a paper"<ref>https://ori.hhs.gov/establishing-authorship</ref>. In | * The office of research integrity states that "Only those individuals who have made substantitve contributions to a project merit authorship in a paper"<ref>https://ori.hhs.gov/establishing-authorship</ref>. In Proteopedia, anyone who makes an edit is included in the automatically maintained list of authors. If you copy and paste material, or if a group of authors writes a piece that is posted by a single individual, attribution should be included in a different manner. If possible, include a paragraph summarizing the contributions of each author. | ||
* "Faculty-student collaborations should follow the same criteria to establish authorship. Mentors must exercise great care to neither award authorship to students whose contributions do not merit it, nor to deny authorship and due credit to the work of students." <ref>https://ori.hhs.gov/authorship-faculty-student-collaborations</ref> | * "Faculty-student collaborations should follow the same criteria to establish authorship. Mentors must exercise great care to neither award authorship to students whose contributions do not merit it, nor to deny authorship and due credit to the work of students." <ref>https://ori.hhs.gov/authorship-faculty-student-collaborations</ref> | ||
* Academic or professional ghost authorship in the sciences is ethically unacceptable. | * Academic or professional ghost authorship in the sciences is ethically unacceptable. | ||