JSmol/Rotation Speeds: Difference between revisions

Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Conclusions==
==Conclusions==


<span style="font-size:130%;">Update '''March 2017''' for JSmol:</span> (There are only minor differences from the May, 2016 results.)
<span style="font-size:130%;">Update '''July 2017''' for JSmol:</span> (There are only minor differences from the May, 2016 results.)


*Windows (JSmol, no Java):
*Windows (JSmol, no Java):
**Firefox performs best.
**Firefox and Chrome perform similarly. (Cartoon rotation: Chrome outpeforms Firefox, about 2x more frames/second. Spacefill rotation: Firefox outperforms Chrome.)
**Chrome: Rotation by mouse was as good as in Firefox. Spinning was jerkier than Firefox by about two-fold.
**Chrome: Rotation by mouse was as good as in Firefox. Spinning was jerkier than Firefox by about two-fold.
**Edge: NOT RECOMMENDED. Very sluggish. Spinning and rotation by mouse are very jerky.
**Edge: NOT RECOMMENDED. Very sluggish. Spinning and rotation by mouse are very jerky.

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Eric Martz