6d6h: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Triclinic lysozyme cryocooled to 100 K with 47% MPD as cryoprotectant== | ==Triclinic lysozyme cryocooled to 100 K with 47% MPD as cryoprotectant== | ||
<StructureSection load='6d6h' size='340' side='right' caption='[[6d6h]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 2.00Å' scene=''> | <StructureSection load='6d6h' size='340' side='right'caption='[[6d6h]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 2.00Å' scene=''> | ||
== Structural highlights == | == Structural highlights == | ||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[6d6h]] is a 1 chain structure with sequence from [ | <table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[6d6h]] is a 1 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallus_gallus Gallus gallus]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=6D6H OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=6D6H FirstGlance]. <br> | ||
</td></tr><tr id=' | </td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 2.000064Å</td></tr> | ||
<tr id=' | <tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=MRD:(4R)-2-METHYLPENTANE-2,4-DIOL'>MRD</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=NO3:NITRATE+ION'>NO3</scene></td></tr> | ||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[ | <tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=6d6h FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=6d6h OCA], [https://pdbe.org/6d6h PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=6d6h RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/6d6h PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=6d6h ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
== Function == | == Function == | ||
[ | [https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/LYSC_CHICK LYSC_CHICK] Lysozymes have primarily a bacteriolytic function; those in tissues and body fluids are associated with the monocyte-macrophage system and enhance the activity of immunoagents. Has bacteriolytic activity against M.luteus.<ref>PMID:22044478</ref> | ||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | |||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | |||
Cryocooling of macromolecular crystals is commonly employed to limit radiation damage during X-ray diffraction data collection. However, cooling itself affects macromolecular conformation and often damages crystals via poorly understood processes. Here, the effects of cryosolution thermal contraction on macromolecular conformation and crystal order in crystals ranging from 32 to 67% solvent content are systematically investigated. It is found that the solution thermal contraction affects macromolecule configurations and volumes, unit-cell volumes, crystal packing and crystal order. The effects occur through not only thermal contraction, but also pressure caused by the mismatched contraction of cryosolvent and pores. Higher solvent-content crystals are more affected. In some cases the solvent contraction can be adjusted to reduce mosaicity and increase the strength of diffraction. Ice formation in some crystals is found to cause damage via a reduction in unit-cell volume, which is interpreted through solvent transport out of unit cells during cooling. The results point to more deductive approaches to cryoprotection optimization by adjusting the cryosolution composition to reduce thermal contraction-induced stresses in the crystal with cooling. | |||
The impact of cryosolution thermal contraction on proteins and protein crystals: volumes, conformation and order.,Juers DH, Farley CA, Saxby CP, Cotter RA, Cahn JKB, Holton-Burke RC, Harrison K, Wu Z Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Sep 1;74(Pt 9):922-938. doi:, 10.1107/S2059798318008793. Epub 2018 Sep 5. PMID:30198901<ref>PMID:30198901</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pdbe-citations 6d6h" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | |||
==See Also== | |||
*[[Lysozyme 3D structures|Lysozyme 3D structures]] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| Line 15: | Line 27: | ||
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> | ||
[[Category: Gallus gallus]] | [[Category: Gallus gallus]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Large Structures]] | ||
[[Category: Juers | [[Category: Juers DH]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:05, 30 October 2024
Triclinic lysozyme cryocooled to 100 K with 47% MPD as cryoprotectantTriclinic lysozyme cryocooled to 100 K with 47% MPD as cryoprotectant
Structural highlights
FunctionLYSC_CHICK Lysozymes have primarily a bacteriolytic function; those in tissues and body fluids are associated with the monocyte-macrophage system and enhance the activity of immunoagents. Has bacteriolytic activity against M.luteus.[1] Publication Abstract from PubMedCryocooling of macromolecular crystals is commonly employed to limit radiation damage during X-ray diffraction data collection. However, cooling itself affects macromolecular conformation and often damages crystals via poorly understood processes. Here, the effects of cryosolution thermal contraction on macromolecular conformation and crystal order in crystals ranging from 32 to 67% solvent content are systematically investigated. It is found that the solution thermal contraction affects macromolecule configurations and volumes, unit-cell volumes, crystal packing and crystal order. The effects occur through not only thermal contraction, but also pressure caused by the mismatched contraction of cryosolvent and pores. Higher solvent-content crystals are more affected. In some cases the solvent contraction can be adjusted to reduce mosaicity and increase the strength of diffraction. Ice formation in some crystals is found to cause damage via a reduction in unit-cell volume, which is interpreted through solvent transport out of unit cells during cooling. The results point to more deductive approaches to cryoprotection optimization by adjusting the cryosolution composition to reduce thermal contraction-induced stresses in the crystal with cooling. The impact of cryosolution thermal contraction on proteins and protein crystals: volumes, conformation and order.,Juers DH, Farley CA, Saxby CP, Cotter RA, Cahn JKB, Holton-Burke RC, Harrison K, Wu Z Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2018 Sep 1;74(Pt 9):922-938. doi:, 10.1107/S2059798318008793. Epub 2018 Sep 5. PMID:30198901[2] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. See AlsoReferences
|
| ||||||||||||||||||