Introduction to molecular visualization: Difference between revisions

Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
Eric Martz (talk | contribs)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 80: Line 80:
</td><td>
</td><td>
Protein chains
Protein chains
<span style="background-color:black;padding:5px 8px 1px 6px;font-size:120%;"><b><font color="#bbb">C</font> <font color="red">O</font></b></span>
<span style="background-color:black;padding:5px 8px 1px 6px;font-size:110%;"><b><font color="#acb8e2">A</font> <font color="#a0df99">B</font></b></span>
simplified to backbone traces.
simplified to backbone traces.
</td><td>
</td><td>
[[FirstGlance in Jmol|FirstGlance]] enlarges the sulfur-sulfur bond.
[[FirstGlance in Jmol|FirstGlance]] enlarges the sulfur-sulfur bond.
</td><td>
</td><td>
Schematic disulfide bond connecting ribbon backbones.
Schematic disulfide bridge connecting ribbon backbones.
</td><td>
</td><td>
Disulfide bond colored by chain.
Disulfide bridge colored by chain, an option in [[FirstGlance in Jmol|FirstGlance]].
</td></tr></table>
</td></tr></table>
[[FirstGlance in Jmol]] highlights disulfide bonds in one click (in its ''Tools'' tab), and has
[[FirstGlance in Jmol]] highlights disulfide bonds in one click (in its ''Tools'' tab), and has
Line 162: Line 162:


==Obtaining Molecular Models==
==Obtaining Molecular Models==
Methods for searching the [[Protein Data Bank]] for published empirical 3D models are [[Practical_Guide_to_Homology_Modeling#Do_you_need_a_homology_model.3F|explained here]]. ''Empirical models'' are those determined by experimentation, notably [[X-ray diffraction]], [[solution nuclear magnetic resonance]], or cryo-electron microscopy. Empirical models are far more reliable than [[theoretical models]], but one must pay attention to the [[Quality assessment for molecular models|quality of an empirical model]] since some are more reliable than others.
You can browse for molecular models at the [http://atlas.molviz.org Atlas of Macromolecules], the [http://pdb101.rcsb.org/ Molecule of the Month], or [https://web.expasy.org/spotlight/ Protein Spotlight].


Empirical models are available for only a small fraction of all proteins, probably <10%. If an empirical model is not available, the next best thing would be a [[homology model]]. About one third of all proteins can be reliably homology modeled, but homology models have [[Practical_Guide_to_Homology_Modeling#Limitations_of_Homology_Modeling|more uncertainties]] than do empirical models.
[[How To Find A Structure]] explains an easy way to find a structure for a protein of interest, and how to choose the best one available when there is more than one. [[Empirical models]] are those determined by experimentation, notably [[X-ray diffraction]], [[solution nuclear magnetic resonance]], or [[electron cryomicroscopy]]. Empirical models are the most reliable, but one must pay attention to the [[Quality assessment for molecular models|quality of an empirical model]] since some are more reliable than others.
 
Empirical models are available for only a small fraction of all proteins, probably <10%. When an empirical model is not available, [[AlphaFold]] has a proven track record of predicting protein structures correctly from their sequences, using artificial intelligence (AI). [[AlphaFold]] also reliably predicts the confidence of each part of a predicted structure.


==See Also==
==See Also==
Line 171: Line 173:
*[[History of Macromolecular Visualization]]
*[[History of Macromolecular Visualization]]
*[[Molecular Sculpture]]
*[[Molecular Sculpture]]
[[Category: Alternate Renderings]]

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

Eric Martz, Karsten Theis