2ol6: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==The crystal structure of OspA mutant== | ==The crystal structure of OspA mutant== | ||
<StructureSection load='2ol6' size='340' side='right' caption='[[2ol6]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 1.60Å' scene=''> | <StructureSection load='2ol6' size='340' side='right'caption='[[2ol6]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 1.60Å' scene=''> | ||
== Structural highlights == | == Structural highlights == | ||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[2ol6]] is a 1 chain structure with sequence from [ | <table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[2ol6]] is a 1 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borreliella_burgdorferi Borreliella burgdorferi]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=2OL6 OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2OL6 FirstGlance]. <br> | ||
</td></tr><tr id=' | </td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 1.6Å</td></tr> | ||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2ol6 FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=2ol6 OCA], [https://pdbe.org/2ol6 PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=2ol6 RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/2ol6 PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=2ol6 ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | |||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[ | |||
</table> | </table> | ||
== Function == | |||
[https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q45040_BORBG Q45040_BORBG] | |||
== Evolutionary Conservation == | == Evolutionary Conservation == | ||
[[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | [[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | ||
Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Borreliella burgdorferi]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Large Structures]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Koide S]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Makabe K]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Terechko V]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:42, 30 August 2023
The crystal structure of OspA mutantThe crystal structure of OspA mutant
Structural highlights
FunctionEvolutionary Conservation![]() Check, as determined by ConSurfDB. You may read the explanation of the method and the full data available from ConSurf. Publication Abstract from PubMedWe investigated how the register between adjacent beta-strands is specified using a series of mutants of the single-layer beta-sheet (SLB) in Borrelia OspA. The single-layer architecture of this system eliminates structural restraints imposed by a hydrophobic core, enabling us to address this question. A critical turn (turn 9/10) in the SLB was replaced with a segment with an intentional structural mismatch. Its crystal structure revealed a one-residue insertion into the central beta-strand (strand 9) of the SLB. This insertion triggered a surprisingly large-scale structural rearrangement: (i) the central strand (strand 9) was shifted by one residue, causing the strand to flip with respect to the adjacent beta-strands and thus completely disrupting the native side-chain contacts; (ii) the three-residue turn located on the opposite end of the beta-strand (turn 8/9) was pushed into its preceding beta-strand (strand 8); (iii) the register between strands 8 and 9 was shifted by three residues. Replacing the original sequence for turn 8/9 with a stronger turn motif restored the original strand register but still with a flipped beta-strand 9. The stability differences of these distinct structures were surprisingly small, consistent with an energy landscape where multiple low-energy states with different beta-sheet configurations exist. The observed conformations can be rationalized in terms of maximizing the number of backbone H-bonds. These results suggest that adjacent beta-strands "stick" through the use of factors that are not highly sequence specific and that beta-strands could slide back and forth relatively easily in the absence of external elements such as turns and tertiary packing. Beta-strand flipping and slipping triggered by turn replacement reveal the opportunistic nature of beta-strand pairing.,Makabe K, Yan S, Tereshko V, Gawlak G, Koide S J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Nov 28;129(47):14661-9. Epub 2007 Nov 7. PMID:17985889[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. See AlsoReferences
|
|