Structural templates: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(25 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<StructureSection load='1aay' size='350' side='right' caption='' scene=''> | |||
==Motifs In Proteins== | ==Motifs In Proteins== | ||
The term "motif" when used in structural biology tends to refer to one of two cases: | The term "motif" when used in structural biology tends to refer to one of two cases: | ||
<OL> | <OL> | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
The example structure shown to <scene name='40/401510/Cv/3'>illustrate the motif</scene> is that of Zif268 protein-DNA complex from Mus musculus (PDB entry 1AAY). In this example (a C2H2 class zinc finger) the conserved <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Zinc_finger_cysteine/1'>cysteine</scene> and <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Zinc_finger_histidine/2'>histidine</scene> residues form ligands to a <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Zinc_finger_zn/1'>zinc ion</scene> whose coordination is essential to stabilise the tertiary fold of the protein. The fold is important because it helps orientate the <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Zinc_finger_recognition/1'>recognition helices</scene> to bind to the <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Zinc_finger_major_groove/1'>major groove of the DNA</scene>. | |||
The example structure shown to <scene name=' | |||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
Line 60: | Line 59: | ||
===β-sheets=== | ===β-sheets=== | ||
< | |||
In the <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_start/2'>Jmol viewer to the right PDB entry 5p21</scene> has been coloured by secondary structure (α-helices are coloured magenta and β-strands are coloured yellow). A single <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_beta/1'>beta-strand</scene> can technically be described as a flat helix with 2 residues per turn although this may not be initially obvious. <br> | |||
When two or more beta strands lie next to each other, forming hydrogen bonds between them, this is what is termed a <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_betasheet/1'>β-sheet</scene>. As the backbones need to come close together to interact and form a sheet, the <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_beta_sc/1'>sidechains are oriented away from the plane of the sheet</scene>. As the polypeptide chain is synthesised from the amino terminus to the carboxyl terminus it has a directionality (represented in the cartoon format as an arrowhead on each beta strand). β-sheets therefore occur in two varieties:<OL> | When two or more beta strands lie next to each other, forming hydrogen bonds between them, this is what is termed a <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_betasheet/1'>β-sheet</scene>. As the backbones need to come close together to interact and form a sheet, the <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_beta_sc/1'>sidechains are oriented away from the plane of the sheet</scene>. As the polypeptide chain is synthesised from the amino terminus to the carboxyl terminus it has a directionality (represented in the cartoon format as an arrowhead on each beta strand). β-sheets therefore occur in two varieties:<OL> | ||
<LI><scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_beta_ap/1'>Anti-parallel</scene> - here the beta strands aligned next to each other run in opposite directions. As the interacting carbonyls and amides align well, the hydrogen bonds appear to be straight. | <LI><scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_beta_ap/1'>Anti-parallel</scene> - here the beta strands aligned next to each other run in opposite directions. As the interacting carbonyls and amides align well, the hydrogen bonds appear to be straight. | ||
Line 69: | Line 68: | ||
===Turns and loops=== | ===Turns and loops=== | ||
There are a number of small hydrogen bonded motifs and patterns which are observed regularly. These are described below:<UL> | There are a number of small hydrogen bonded motifs and patterns which are observed regularly. These are described below:<UL> | ||
<LI>'''<scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_betaturn/1'>Beta Turns</scene>''' - originally defined by the one hydrogen bond common to all (an i, i+3 hydrogen bond) but some modern descriptions do not require a hydrogen bond. | <LI>'''<scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_betaturn/1'>Beta Turns</scene>''' - originally defined by the one hydrogen bond common to all (an i, i+3 hydrogen bond) but some modern descriptions do not require a hydrogen bond. | ||
Line 81: | Line 80: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{{Clear}} | {{Clear}} | ||
These secondary structure motifs can be combined to form functional motifs, the most well known of which is the helix-turn-helix motif found in a number of DNA-binding proteins. The computational identification of these motifs is straightforward but made complicated by the fact that not all helix-turn-helix motifs bind DNA. The problem faced here is therefore one involving the distinguishing between true and false positives. The structure to the right is that of lambda repressor bound to DNA. The helix-turn-helix motif is readily identified in green. | These secondary structure motifs can be combined to form functional motifs, the most well known of which is the helix-turn-helix motif found in a number of DNA-binding proteins. The computational identification of these motifs is straightforward but made complicated by the fact that not all helix-turn-helix motifs bind DNA. The problem faced here is therefore one involving the distinguishing between true and false positives. The structure to the right is that of lambda repressor bound to DNA. The helix-turn-helix motif is readily identified in green. | ||
Line 98: | Line 97: | ||
In compound nests the result is a long chain with all the overlapping nests facing a similar direction. This basically forms a much wider nest that is capable of binding a larger anionic group of atoms such as the phosphate ion, and are usually functionally important motifs. Tandem nests are not as common and, due to the greater change in the direction that adjacent nests face, only seem to perform functional roles when found in conjunction with one or more compound nests. | In compound nests the result is a long chain with all the overlapping nests facing a similar direction. This basically forms a much wider nest that is capable of binding a larger anionic group of atoms such as the phosphate ion, and are usually functionally important motifs. Tandem nests are not as common and, due to the greater change in the direction that adjacent nests face, only seem to perform functional roles when found in conjunction with one or more compound nests. | ||
One of the most well known functional compound nests is found in the phosphate-binding loop of Ras protein (PDB entry 5p21). The <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_ploop/1'>P-loop</scene> is a well described ATP- or GTP-binding loop present in a large superfamily of important proteins which includes G-proteins and kinases. The main feature of the P-loop is a long compound LRLR nest that <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_ploop_nest/1'>forms a binding site for the β-phosphate of ATP or GTP</scene>. However, this is an example of a motif where the ligand also binds to the free main chain NH groups at the N-terminus of an alpha helix. On closer inspection it becomes evident that this interaction is in addition to the compound nest and does not interfere with it. Therefore the P-loop is actually more accurately described as a compound LRLR nest and an adjacent helical N-terminus that collectively bind to the α- and β-phosphates of the GDP substrate. The P-loop, which is retained throughout the superfamily, has a highly conserved GxxxxGKS/T consensus sequence (where the xxGK section forms the LRLR compound nest). | One of the most well known functional compound nests is found in the phosphate-binding loop of Ras protein (PDB entry 5p21). The <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_ploop/1'>P-loop</scene> is a well described ATP- or GTP-binding loop present in a large superfamily of important proteins which includes G-proteins and kinases. The main feature of the P-loop is a long compound LRLR nest that <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Secondary_structure_ploop_nest/1'>forms a binding site for the β-phosphate of ATP or GTP</scene>. However, this is an example of a motif where the ligand also binds to the free main chain NH groups at the N-terminus of an alpha helix. On closer inspection it becomes evident that this interaction is in addition to the compound nest and does not interfere with it. Therefore the P-loop is actually more accurately described as a compound LRLR nest and an adjacent helical N-terminus that collectively bind to the α- and β-phosphates of the GDP substrate. The P-loop, which is retained throughout the superfamily, has a highly conserved GxxxxGKS/T consensus sequence (where the xxGK section forms the LRLR compound nest). | ||
Line 109: | Line 107: | ||
Serine proteases are found in a number of organisms but common to their function is the hydrolysis of peptide bonds. These enzymes catalyse the reaction using a highly reactive serine residue to attack the carbonyl group of the backbone to be hydrolysed. The chemistry of this reaction and the regeneration of the active site, requires the presence of the Ser-His-Asp catalytic triad. In chymotrypsin (PDB entry [[1ab9]]) these residues are (Ser-195, His-57 and Asp-102) whereas in the bacterial subtilisin (PDB entry [[1st2]]) the site is formed by (Ser-221, His-64 and Asp-32). These two proteins are evolutionary unrelated and this is the classic example of convergent evolution to solve the problem of peptide bond hydrolysis. | Serine proteases are found in a number of organisms but common to their function is the hydrolysis of peptide bonds. These enzymes catalyse the reaction using a highly reactive serine residue to attack the carbonyl group of the backbone to be hydrolysed. The chemistry of this reaction and the regeneration of the active site, requires the presence of the Ser-His-Asp catalytic triad. In chymotrypsin (PDB entry [[1ab9]]) these residues are (Ser-195, His-57 and Asp-102) whereas in the bacterial subtilisin (PDB entry [[1st2]]) the site is formed by (Ser-221, His-64 and Asp-32). These two proteins are evolutionary unrelated and this is the classic example of convergent evolution to solve the problem of peptide bond hydrolysis. | ||
The detection of these types of motif is almost impossible by looking at the amino acid sequence: there is no evolutionary relationship to detect, the residues are ordered differently in the sequence, and the spacing between the residues also varies. These motifs can be detected relativeley easily using structural comparison, particularly template-based motif detection algorithms. | The detection of these types of motif is almost impossible by looking at the amino acid sequence: there is no evolutionary relationship to detect, the residues are ordered differently in the sequence, and the spacing between the residues also varies. These motifs can be detected relativeley easily using structural comparison, particularly template-based motif detection algorithms. Note that the global folds of subtilisin and chymotrypsin are very different so the site could not have been detected using such methods. Click to see the catalytic triad in <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Subtilisin_startpoint_catalyti/1' target='subtilisin'>subtilisin</scene> and <scene name='User:James_D_Watson/Structural_Templates/Chymotrypsin_start_triad/1' target='chymotrypsin'>chymotrypsin</scene> respectively. | ||
< | </StructureSection> |