2jqr: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Solution model of crosslinked complex of cytochrome c and adrenodoxin== | |||
<StructureSection load='2jqr' size='340' side='right'caption='[[2jqr]]' scene=''> | |||
== Structural highlights == | |||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[2jqr]] is a 2 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bos_taurus Bos taurus] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccharomyces_cerevisiae Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Full experimental information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=2JQR OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2JQR FirstGlance]. <br> | |||
</td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">Solution NMR, 10 models</td></tr> | |||
<tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=FES:FE2/S2+(INORGANIC)+CLUSTER'>FES</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=HEC:HEME+C'>HEC</scene></td></tr> | |||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2jqr FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=2jqr OCA], [https://pdbe.org/2jqr PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=2jqr RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/2jqr PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=2jqr ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
== Function == | |||
[https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/CYC1_YEAST CYC1_YEAST] Electron carrier protein. The oxidized form of the cytochrome c heme group can accept an electron from the heme group of the cytochrome c1 subunit of cytochrome reductase. Cytochrome c then transfers this electron to the cytochrome oxidase complex, the final protein carrier in the mitochondrial electron-transport chain. | |||
== Evolutionary Conservation == | |||
[[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | |||
Check<jmol> | |||
<jmolCheckbox> | |||
<scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/jq/2jqr_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked> | |||
<scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/initialview03.spt</scriptWhenUnchecked> | |||
<text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text> | |||
</jmolCheckbox> | |||
</jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=2jqr ConSurf]. | |||
<div style="clear:both"></div> | |||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | |||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | |||
In the general view of protein-complex formation, a transient and dynamic encounter complex proceeds to form a more stable, well-defined, and active form. In weak protein complexes, however, the encounter state can represent a significant population of the complex. The redox proteins adrenodoxin (Adx) and cytochrome c (C c) associate to form such a weak and short-lived complex, which is nevertheless active in electron transfer. To study the conformational freedom within the protein complex, the native complex has been compared to a cross-linked counterpart by using solution scattering and NMR spectroscopy. Oligomerization behavior of the native complex in solution revealed by small-angle X-ray scattering indicates a stochastic nature of complex formation. For the cross-linked complex, interprotein paramagnetic effects are observed, whereas for the native complex, extensive averaging occurs, consistent with multiple orientations of the proteins within the complex. Simulations show that C c samples about half of the surface area of adrenodoxin. It is concluded that the complex of Adx/C c is entirely dynamic and can be considered as a pure encounter complex. | |||
Dynamics in a pure encounter complex of two proteins studied by solution scattering and paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy.,Xu X, Reinle W, Hannemann F, Konarev PV, Svergun DI, Bernhardt R, Ubbink M J Am Chem Soc. 2008 May 21;130(20):6395-403. Epub 2008 Apr 26. PMID:18439013<ref>PMID:18439013</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pdbe-citations 2jqr" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
*[[Cytochrome | *[[Cytochrome C 3D structures|Cytochrome C 3D structures]] | ||
*[[Ferredoxin|Ferredoxin]] | *[[Ferredoxin 3D structures|Ferredoxin 3D structures]] | ||
== References == | |||
== | <references/> | ||
< | __TOC__ | ||
</StructureSection> | |||
[[Category: Bos taurus]] | [[Category: Bos taurus]] | ||
[[Category: Large Structures]] | |||
[[Category: Saccharomyces cerevisiae]] | [[Category: Saccharomyces cerevisiae]] | ||
[[Category: Bernhardt | [[Category: Bernhardt R]] | ||
[[Category: Hannemann | [[Category: Hannemann F]] | ||
[[Category: Konarev | [[Category: Konarev PV]] | ||
[[Category: Reinle | [[Category: Reinle W]] | ||
[[Category: Svergun | [[Category: Svergun DI]] | ||
[[Category: Ubbink | [[Category: Ubbink M]] | ||
[[Category: Xu | [[Category: Xu X]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 30 October 2024
Solution model of crosslinked complex of cytochrome c and adrenodoxinSolution model of crosslinked complex of cytochrome c and adrenodoxin
Structural highlights
FunctionCYC1_YEAST Electron carrier protein. The oxidized form of the cytochrome c heme group can accept an electron from the heme group of the cytochrome c1 subunit of cytochrome reductase. Cytochrome c then transfers this electron to the cytochrome oxidase complex, the final protein carrier in the mitochondrial electron-transport chain. Evolutionary Conservation Check, as determined by ConSurfDB. You may read the explanation of the method and the full data available from ConSurf. Publication Abstract from PubMedIn the general view of protein-complex formation, a transient and dynamic encounter complex proceeds to form a more stable, well-defined, and active form. In weak protein complexes, however, the encounter state can represent a significant population of the complex. The redox proteins adrenodoxin (Adx) and cytochrome c (C c) associate to form such a weak and short-lived complex, which is nevertheless active in electron transfer. To study the conformational freedom within the protein complex, the native complex has been compared to a cross-linked counterpart by using solution scattering and NMR spectroscopy. Oligomerization behavior of the native complex in solution revealed by small-angle X-ray scattering indicates a stochastic nature of complex formation. For the cross-linked complex, interprotein paramagnetic effects are observed, whereas for the native complex, extensive averaging occurs, consistent with multiple orientations of the proteins within the complex. Simulations show that C c samples about half of the surface area of adrenodoxin. It is concluded that the complex of Adx/C c is entirely dynamic and can be considered as a pure encounter complex. Dynamics in a pure encounter complex of two proteins studied by solution scattering and paramagnetic NMR spectroscopy.,Xu X, Reinle W, Hannemann F, Konarev PV, Svergun DI, Bernhardt R, Ubbink M J Am Chem Soc. 2008 May 21;130(20):6395-403. Epub 2008 Apr 26. PMID:18439013[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. See AlsoReferences
|
| ||||||||||||||||||