Quality assessment for molecular models: Difference between revisions
add deep learning validation methods that are gaining traction |
fix a typo |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
There are several free automated servers that can improve most published models. See [[Improving published models]]. | There are several free automated servers that can improve most published models. See [[Improving published models]]. | ||
Recently, new methods for protein structure validation | Recently, new methods for protein structure validation based on the compatibility of a structure with the inter-residue distances and contacts predicted by methods such as AlphaFold 2 have been introduced <ref>PMID: 36458613/</ref>. Then all 3-5Å resolution cryo-EM and crystallographic structures in the PDB with that method, identifying thousands of likely register errors via these scans for locally incorrect PDB structures <ref>https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.19.604304</ref>. | ||
==Further Reading== | ==Further Reading== |