2b11: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
New page: left|200px<br /><applet load="2b11" size="450" color="white" frame="true" align="right" spinBox="true" caption="2b11, resolution 2.300Å" /> '''Crystal structure o... |
No edit summary |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== | ==Crystal structure of the protein-protein complex between F82W cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase== | ||
Although bonding networks determine electron-transfer (ET) rates within | <StructureSection load='2b11' size='340' side='right'caption='[[2b11]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 2.30Å' scene=''> | ||
== Structural highlights == | |||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[2b11]] is a 4 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccharomyces_cerevisiae Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=2B11 OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2B11 FirstGlance]. <br> | |||
</td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 2.3Å</td></tr> | |||
<tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=HEC:HEME+C'>HEC</scene></td></tr> | |||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2b11 FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=2b11 OCA], [https://pdbe.org/2b11 PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=2b11 RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/2b11 PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=2b11 ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
== Function == | |||
[https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/CCPR_YEAST CCPR_YEAST] Destroys radicals which are normally produced within the cells and which are toxic to biological systems. | |||
== Evolutionary Conservation == | |||
[[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | |||
Check<jmol> | |||
<jmolCheckbox> | |||
<scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/b1/2b11_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked> | |||
<scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/initialview03.spt</scriptWhenUnchecked> | |||
<text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text> | |||
</jmolCheckbox> | |||
</jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=2b11 ConSurf]. | |||
<div style="clear:both"></div> | |||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | |||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | |||
Although bonding networks determine electron-transfer (ET) rates within proteins, the mechanism by which structure and dynamics influence ET across protein interfaces is not well understood. Measurements of photochemically induced ET and subsequent charge recombination between Zn-porphyrin-substituted cytochrome c peroxidase and cytochrome c in single crystals correlate reactivity with defined structures for different association modes of the redox partners. Structures and ET rates in crystals are consistent with tryptophan oxidation mediating charge recombination reactions. Conservative mutations at the interface can drastically affect how the proteins orient and dispose redox centers. Whereas some configurations are ET inactive, the wild-type complex exhibits the fastest recombination rate. Other association modes generate ET rates that do not correlate with predictions based on cofactor separations or simple bonding pathways. Inhibition of photoinduced ET at <273 K indicates gating by small-amplitude dynamics, even within the crystal. Thus, different associations achieve states of similar reactivity, and within those states conformational fluctuations enable interprotein ET. | |||
Effects of interface mutations on association modes and electron-transfer rates between proteins.,Kang SA, Crane BR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15465-70. Epub 2005 Oct 14. PMID:16227441<ref>PMID:16227441</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |||
</div> | |||
[[ | <div class="pdbe-citations 2b11" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | ||
[[Category: | |||
==See Also== | |||
*[[Cytochrome C 3D structures|Cytochrome C 3D structures]] | |||
*[[Cytochrome c peroxidase 3D structures|Cytochrome c peroxidase 3D structures]] | |||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
__TOC__ | |||
</StructureSection> | |||
[[Category: Large Structures]] | |||
[[Category: Saccharomyces cerevisiae]] | [[Category: Saccharomyces cerevisiae]] | ||
[[Category: Crane | [[Category: Crane BR]] | ||
[[Category: Kang | [[Category: Kang SA]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:44, 25 December 2024
Crystal structure of the protein-protein complex between F82W cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidaseCrystal structure of the protein-protein complex between F82W cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase
Structural highlights
FunctionCCPR_YEAST Destroys radicals which are normally produced within the cells and which are toxic to biological systems. Evolutionary Conservation Check, as determined by ConSurfDB. You may read the explanation of the method and the full data available from ConSurf. Publication Abstract from PubMedAlthough bonding networks determine electron-transfer (ET) rates within proteins, the mechanism by which structure and dynamics influence ET across protein interfaces is not well understood. Measurements of photochemically induced ET and subsequent charge recombination between Zn-porphyrin-substituted cytochrome c peroxidase and cytochrome c in single crystals correlate reactivity with defined structures for different association modes of the redox partners. Structures and ET rates in crystals are consistent with tryptophan oxidation mediating charge recombination reactions. Conservative mutations at the interface can drastically affect how the proteins orient and dispose redox centers. Whereas some configurations are ET inactive, the wild-type complex exhibits the fastest recombination rate. Other association modes generate ET rates that do not correlate with predictions based on cofactor separations or simple bonding pathways. Inhibition of photoinduced ET at <273 K indicates gating by small-amplitude dynamics, even within the crystal. Thus, different associations achieve states of similar reactivity, and within those states conformational fluctuations enable interprotein ET. Effects of interface mutations on association modes and electron-transfer rates between proteins.,Kang SA, Crane BR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15465-70. Epub 2005 Oct 14. PMID:16227441[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. See AlsoReferences |
| ||||||||||||||||||