1jwp: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<StructureSection load='1jwp' size='340' side='right'caption='[[1jwp]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 1.75Å' scene=''> | <StructureSection load='1jwp' size='340' side='right'caption='[[1jwp]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 1.75Å' scene=''> | ||
== Structural highlights == | == Structural highlights == | ||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[1jwp]] is a 1 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ | <table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[1jwp]] is a 1 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escherichia_coli Escherichia coli]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=1JWP OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1JWP FirstGlance]. <br> | ||
</td></tr><tr id=' | </td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 1.75Å</td></tr> | ||
<tr id=' | <tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=PO4:PHOSPHATE+ION'>PO4</scene></td></tr> | ||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1jwp FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=1jwp OCA], [https://pdbe.org/1jwp PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1jwp RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/1jwp PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=1jwp ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | <tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1jwp FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=1jwp OCA], [https://pdbe.org/1jwp PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1jwp RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/1jwp PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=1jwp ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
== Function == | == Function == | ||
[https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/BLAT_ECOLX BLAT_ECOLX] TEM-type are the most prevalent beta-lactamases in enterobacteria; they hydrolyze the beta-lactam bond in susceptible beta-lactam antibiotics, thus conferring resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins. TEM-3 and TEM-4 are capable of hydrolyzing cefotaxime and ceftazidime. TEM-5 is capable of hydrolyzing ceftazidime. TEM-6 is capable of hydrolyzing ceftazidime and aztreonam. TEM-8/CAZ-2, TEM-16/CAZ-7 and TEM-24/CAZ-6 are markedly active against ceftazidime. IRT-4 shows resistance to beta-lactamase inhibitors. | |||
== Evolutionary Conservation == | == Evolutionary Conservation == | ||
[[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | [[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | ||
| Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
<jmolCheckbox> | <jmolCheckbox> | ||
<scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/jw/1jwp_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked> | <scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/jw/1jwp_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked> | ||
<scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/ | <scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/initialview03.spt</scriptWhenUnchecked> | ||
<text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text> | <text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text> | ||
</jmolCheckbox> | </jmolCheckbox> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 36: | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
</StructureSection> | </StructureSection> | ||
[[Category: | [[Category: Escherichia coli]] | ||
[[Category: Large Structures]] | [[Category: Large Structures]] | ||
[[Category: Minasov | [[Category: Minasov G]] | ||
[[Category: Shoichet | [[Category: Shoichet BK]] | ||
[[Category: Wang | [[Category: Wang X]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:51, 30 October 2024
Structure of M182T mutant of TEM-1 beta-lactamaseStructure of M182T mutant of TEM-1 beta-lactamase
Structural highlights
FunctionBLAT_ECOLX TEM-type are the most prevalent beta-lactamases in enterobacteria; they hydrolyze the beta-lactam bond in susceptible beta-lactam antibiotics, thus conferring resistance to penicillins and cephalosporins. TEM-3 and TEM-4 are capable of hydrolyzing cefotaxime and ceftazidime. TEM-5 is capable of hydrolyzing ceftazidime. TEM-6 is capable of hydrolyzing ceftazidime and aztreonam. TEM-8/CAZ-2, TEM-16/CAZ-7 and TEM-24/CAZ-6 are markedly active against ceftazidime. IRT-4 shows resistance to beta-lactamase inhibitors. Evolutionary Conservation Check, as determined by ConSurfDB. You may read the explanation of the method and the full data available from ConSurf. Publication Abstract from PubMedPressured by antibiotic use, resistance enzymes have been evolving new activities. Does such evolution have a cost? To investigate this question at the molecular level, clinically isolated mutants of the beta-lactamase TEM-1 were studied. When purified, mutant enzymes had increased activity against cephalosporin antibiotics but lost both thermodynamic stability and kinetic activity against their ancestral targets, penicillins. The X-ray crystallographic structures of three mutant enzymes were determined. These structures suggest that activity gain and stability loss is related to an enlarged active site cavity in the mutant enzymes. In several clinically isolated mutant enzymes, a secondary substitution is observed far from the active site (Met182-->Thr). This substitution had little effect on enzyme activity but restored stability lost by substitutions near the active site. This regained stability conferred an advantage in vivo. This pattern of stability loss and restoration may be common in the evolution of new enzyme activity. Evolution of an antibiotic resistance enzyme constrained by stability and activity trade-offs.,Wang X, Minasov G, Shoichet BK J Mol Biol. 2002 Jun 28;320(1):85-95. PMID:12079336[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. See AlsoReferences
|
| ||||||||||||||||||