1rrd: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
< | ==DNA/RNA HYBRID DUPLEX CONTAINING A PURINE-RICH RNA STRAND, NMR, 10 STRUCTURES== | ||
The | <StructureSection load='1rrd' size='340' side='right'caption='[[1rrd]]' scene=''> | ||
== Structural highlights == | |||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[1rrd]] is a 2 chain structure. Full experimental information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=1RRD OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1RRD FirstGlance]. <br> | |||
or | </td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">Solution NMR</td></tr> | ||
-- | <tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=1rrd FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=1rrd OCA], [https://pdbe.org/1rrd PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1rrd RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/1rrd PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=1rrd ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | ||
</table> | |||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | |||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | |||
The structures of d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), and r(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC) have been determined in solution from NMR data. Globally, the pure DNA and RNA duplexes were in the B and A forms, respectively. The two DNA.RNA hybrids were neither A nor B, but closer globally to the A than the B form. However, the thermodynamically less stable d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) duplex has a significantly different conformation from r(GAAGAGAAGC). d(GCTTCTCTTC). Structures were calculated based on the NMR data, using restrained molecular dynamics. A new approach to the treatment of conformational averaging based on a prioriprobabilities has been used. The nucleotides were treated by fitting the scalar coupling data and NOE time courses to a two-state model comprising N and S sugar puckers each with a different glycosidic torsion angle, and the mole fraction of the S state. Restraint sets for different distributions of N and S states within molecules were constructed, such that each nucleotide was weighted in the ensemble according to the mole fractions (or a prioriprobabilities). The individual nucleotide conformations were strongly restrained, whereas the internucleotide restraints were set relatively loosely. Ensembles of conformations were generated and assessed by comparison of the NOEs calculated from ensemble-averaged relaxation matrices with the experimental NOEs. The ensemble averages accounted for the experimental data much better than any individual member, or for structures calculated assuming a single unique conformation. The two hybrids populated different degrees of conformational space. There was a general trend in minor and major groove widths in the order d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) and a similar progression in global character from B-like to A-like structures. Furthermore, r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC) showed a greater dispersion of conformations in the ensemble than d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), reflecting the greater flexibility of the sugars. If conformational averaging of the nucleotides is ignored, incorrect virtual structures are produced that nevertheless are able to satisfy a substantial fraction of the experimental data. | |||
Solution structures of DNA.RNA hybrids with purine-rich and pyrimidine-rich strands: comparison with the homologous DNA and RNA duplexes.,Gyi JI, Lane AN, Conn GL, Brown T Biochemistry. 1998 Jan 6;37(1):73-80. PMID:9425027<ref>PMID:9425027</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pdbe-citations 1rrd" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | |||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
__TOC__ | |||
</StructureSection> | |||
== | [[Category: Large Structures]] | ||
[[Category: Brown T]] | |||
[[Category: Conn GL]] | |||
== | [[Category: Gyi JI]] | ||
[[Category: Lane AN]] | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
Latest revision as of 12:22, 6 December 2023
DNA/RNA HYBRID DUPLEX CONTAINING A PURINE-RICH RNA STRAND, NMR, 10 STRUCTURESDNA/RNA HYBRID DUPLEX CONTAINING A PURINE-RICH RNA STRAND, NMR, 10 STRUCTURES
Structural highlights
Publication Abstract from PubMedThe structures of d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), and r(GAAGAGAAGC). r(GCUUCUCUUC) have been determined in solution from NMR data. Globally, the pure DNA and RNA duplexes were in the B and A forms, respectively. The two DNA.RNA hybrids were neither A nor B, but closer globally to the A than the B form. However, the thermodynamically less stable d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) duplex has a significantly different conformation from r(GAAGAGAAGC). d(GCTTCTCTTC). Structures were calculated based on the NMR data, using restrained molecular dynamics. A new approach to the treatment of conformational averaging based on a prioriprobabilities has been used. The nucleotides were treated by fitting the scalar coupling data and NOE time courses to a two-state model comprising N and S sugar puckers each with a different glycosidic torsion angle, and the mole fraction of the S state. Restraint sets for different distributions of N and S states within molecules were constructed, such that each nucleotide was weighted in the ensemble according to the mole fractions (or a prioriprobabilities). The individual nucleotide conformations were strongly restrained, whereas the internucleotide restraints were set relatively loosely. Ensembles of conformations were generated and assessed by comparison of the NOEs calculated from ensemble-averaged relaxation matrices with the experimental NOEs. The ensemble averages accounted for the experimental data much better than any individual member, or for structures calculated assuming a single unique conformation. The two hybrids populated different degrees of conformational space. There was a general trend in minor and major groove widths in the order d(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC), r(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC) and a similar progression in global character from B-like to A-like structures. Furthermore, r(GAAGAGAAGC).d(GCTTCTCTTC) showed a greater dispersion of conformations in the ensemble than d(GAAGAGAAGC).r(GCUUCUCUUC), reflecting the greater flexibility of the sugars. If conformational averaging of the nucleotides is ignored, incorrect virtual structures are produced that nevertheless are able to satisfy a substantial fraction of the experimental data. Solution structures of DNA.RNA hybrids with purine-rich and pyrimidine-rich strands: comparison with the homologous DNA and RNA duplexes.,Gyi JI, Lane AN, Conn GL, Brown T Biochemistry. 1998 Jan 6;37(1):73-80. PMID:9425027[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. References
|
| ||||||||||||||||