3fxu: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Crystal structure of TsaR in complex with its effector p-toluenesulfonate== | |||
<StructureSection load='3fxu' size='340' side='right'caption='[[3fxu]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 1.95Å' scene=''> | |||
== Structural highlights == | |||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[3fxu]] is a 2 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comamonas_testosteroni Comamonas testosteroni]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=3FXU OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=3FXU FirstGlance]. <br> | |||
</td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 1.95Å</td></tr> | |||
<tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=CL:CHLORIDE+ION'>CL</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=FMT:FORMIC+ACID'>FMT</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=GOL:GLYCEROL'>GOL</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=IMD:IMIDAZOLE'>IMD</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=TSU:PARA-TOLUENE+SULFONATE'>TSU</scene></td></tr> | |||
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=3fxu FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=3fxu OCA], [https://pdbe.org/3fxu PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=3fxu RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/3fxu PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=3fxu ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
== Function == | |||
[https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/TSAR_COMTE TSAR_COMTE] Regulates expression of the tsaMBCD1 operon and of tsaT in response to p-toluenesulfonate (TSA). Acts by binding directly to the promoter region. Binding to the tsa promoter depends on TSA concentration.<ref>PMID:12676713</ref> <ref>PMID:13680097</ref> | |||
== Evolutionary Conservation == | |||
[[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]] | |||
Check<jmol> | |||
<jmolCheckbox> | |||
<scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/fx/3fxu_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked> | |||
<scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/initialview01.spt</scriptWhenUnchecked> | |||
<text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text> | |||
</jmolCheckbox> | |||
</jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=3fxu ConSurf]. | |||
<div style="clear:both"></div> | |||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | |||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | |||
LysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) constitute the largest family of regulators in prokaryotes. The full-length structures of the LTTR TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 and its complex with the natural inducer para-toluensulfonate have been characterized by X-ray diffraction. Both ligand-free and complexed forms reveal a dramatically different quaternary structure from that of CbnR from Ralstonia eutropha, or a putative LysR-type regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the only other determined full-length structures of tetrameric LTTRs. Although all three show a head-to-head tetrameric ring, TsaR displays an open conformation, whereas CbnR and PA01-PR present additional contacts in opposing C-terminal domains that close the ring. Such large differences may be due to a broader structural versatility than previously assumed or either, reflect the intrinsic flexibility of tetrameric LTTRs. On the grounds of the sliding dimer hypothesis of LTTR activation, we propose a structural model in which the closed structures could reflect the conformation of a ligand-free LTTR, whereas inducer binding would bring about local changes to disrupt the interface linking the two compact C-terminal domains. This could lead to a TsaR-like, open structure, where the pairs of recognition helices are closer to each other by more than 10 A. | |||
Structural studies on the full-length LysR-type regulator TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 reveal a novel open conformation of the tetrameric LTTR fold.,Monferrer D, Tralau T, Kertesz MA, Dix I, Sola M, Uson I Mol Microbiol. 2010 Mar;75(5):1199-214. Epub 2010 Jan 5. PMID:20059681<ref>PMID:20059681</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="pdbe-citations 3fxu" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | |||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
__TOC__ | |||
</StructureSection> | |||
[[Category: Comamonas testosteroni]] | |||
[[Category: Large Structures]] | |||
[[Category: Kertesz MA]] | |||
[[Category: Kikhney A]] | |||
[[Category: Monferrer D]] | |||
[[Category: Svergun D]] | |||
[[Category: Tralau T]] | |||
[[Category: Uson I]] |
Latest revision as of 18:33, 1 November 2023
Crystal structure of TsaR in complex with its effector p-toluenesulfonateCrystal structure of TsaR in complex with its effector p-toluenesulfonate
Structural highlights
FunctionTSAR_COMTE Regulates expression of the tsaMBCD1 operon and of tsaT in response to p-toluenesulfonate (TSA). Acts by binding directly to the promoter region. Binding to the tsa promoter depends on TSA concentration.[1] [2] Evolutionary Conservation![]() Check, as determined by ConSurfDB. You may read the explanation of the method and the full data available from ConSurf. Publication Abstract from PubMedLysR-type transcriptional regulators (LTTRs) constitute the largest family of regulators in prokaryotes. The full-length structures of the LTTR TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 and its complex with the natural inducer para-toluensulfonate have been characterized by X-ray diffraction. Both ligand-free and complexed forms reveal a dramatically different quaternary structure from that of CbnR from Ralstonia eutropha, or a putative LysR-type regulator from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the only other determined full-length structures of tetrameric LTTRs. Although all three show a head-to-head tetrameric ring, TsaR displays an open conformation, whereas CbnR and PA01-PR present additional contacts in opposing C-terminal domains that close the ring. Such large differences may be due to a broader structural versatility than previously assumed or either, reflect the intrinsic flexibility of tetrameric LTTRs. On the grounds of the sliding dimer hypothesis of LTTR activation, we propose a structural model in which the closed structures could reflect the conformation of a ligand-free LTTR, whereas inducer binding would bring about local changes to disrupt the interface linking the two compact C-terminal domains. This could lead to a TsaR-like, open structure, where the pairs of recognition helices are closer to each other by more than 10 A. Structural studies on the full-length LysR-type regulator TsaR from Comamonas testosteroni T-2 reveal a novel open conformation of the tetrameric LTTR fold.,Monferrer D, Tralau T, Kertesz MA, Dix I, Sola M, Uson I Mol Microbiol. 2010 Mar;75(5):1199-214. Epub 2010 Jan 5. PMID:20059681[3] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. References
|
|