2eup: Difference between revisions

From Proteopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:2eup.gif|left|200px]]
<!--
The line below this paragraph, containing "STRUCTURE_2eup", creates the "Structure Box" on the page.
You may change the PDB parameter (which sets the PDB file loaded into the applet)
or the SCENE parameter (which sets the initial scene displayed when the page is loaded),
or leave the SCENE parameter empty for the default display.
-->
{{STRUCTURE_2eup|  PDB=2eup  |  SCENE=  }}
'''Cytochrome c peroxidase (CCP) in complex with 2-amino-5-picoline'''


==Cytochrome c peroxidase (CCP) in complex with 2-amino-5-picoline==
<StructureSection load='2eup' size='340' side='right'caption='[[2eup]], [[Resolution|resolution]] 1.40&Aring;' scene=''>
== Structural highlights ==
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[2eup]] is a 1 chain structure with sequence from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccharomyces_cerevisiae Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=2EUP OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2EUP FirstGlance]. <br>
</td></tr><tr id='method'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Empirical_models|Method:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="methodDat">X-ray diffraction, [[Resolution|Resolution]] 1.4&#8491;</td></tr>
<tr id='ligand'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>[[Ligand|Ligands:]]</b></td><td class="sblockDat" id="ligandDat"><scene name='pdbligand=HEM:PROTOPORPHYRIN+IX+CONTAINING+FE'>HEM</scene>, <scene name='pdbligand=LG4:5-METHYLPYRIDIN-2-AMINE'>LG4</scene></td></tr>
<tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[https://proteopedia.org/fgij/fg.htm?mol=2eup FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=2eup OCA], [https://pdbe.org/2eup PDBe], [https://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=2eup RCSB], [https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/2eup PDBsum], [https://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=2eup ProSAT]</span></td></tr>
</table>
== Function ==
[https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/CCPR_YEAST CCPR_YEAST] Destroys radicals which are normally produced within the cells and which are toxic to biological systems.
== Evolutionary Conservation ==
[[Image:Consurf_key_small.gif|200px|right]]
Check<jmol>
  <jmolCheckbox>
    <scriptWhenChecked>; select protein; define ~consurf_to_do selected; consurf_initial_scene = true; script "/wiki/ConSurf/eu/2eup_consurf.spt"</scriptWhenChecked>
    <scriptWhenUnchecked>script /wiki/extensions/Proteopedia/spt/initialview01.spt</scriptWhenUnchecked>
    <text>to colour the structure by Evolutionary Conservation</text>
  </jmolCheckbox>
</jmol>, as determined by [http://consurfdb.tau.ac.il/ ConSurfDB]. You may read the [[Conservation%2C_Evolutionary|explanation]] of the method and the full data available from [http://bental.tau.ac.il/new_ConSurfDB/main_output.php?pdb_ID=2eup ConSurf].
<div style="clear:both"></div>
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;">
== Publication Abstract from PubMed ==
A model binding site was used to investigate charge-charge interactions in molecular docking. This simple site, a small (180A(3)) engineered cavity in cyctochrome c peroxidase (CCP), is negatively charged and completely buried from solvent, allowing us to explore the balance between electrostatic energy and ligand desolvation energy in a system where many of the common approximations in docking do not apply. A database with about 5300 molecules was docked into this cavity. Retrospective testing with known ligands and decoys showed that overall the balance between electrostatic interaction and desolvation energy was captured. More interesting were prospective docking scre"ens that looked for novel ligands, especially those that might reveal problems with the docking and energy methods. Based on screens of the 5300 compound database, both high-scoring and low-scoring molecules were acquired and tested for binding. Out of 16 new, high-scoring compounds tested, 15 were observed to bind. All of these were small heterocyclic cations. Binding constants were measured for a few of these, they ranged between 20microM and 60microM. Crystal structures were determined for ten of these ligands in complex with the protein. The observed ligand geometry corresponded closely to that predicted by docking. Several low-scoring alkyl amino cations were also tested and found to bind. The low docking score of these molecules owed to the relatively high charge density of the charged amino group and the corresponding high desolvation penalty. When the complex structures of those ligands were determined, a bound water molecule was observed interacting with the amino group and a backbone carbonyl group of the cavity. This water molecule mitigates the desolvation penalty and improves the interaction energy relative to that of the "naked" site used in the docking screen. Finally, six low-scoring neutral molecules were also tested, with a view to looking for false negative predictions. Whereas most of these did not bind, two did (phenol and 3-fluorocatechol). Crystal structures for these two ligands in complex with the cavity site suggest reasons for their binding. That these neutral molecules do, in fact bind, contradicts previous results in this site and, along with the alkyl amines, provides instructive false negatives that help identify weaknesses in our scoring functions. Several improvements of these are considered.


==Overview==
Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site.,Brenk R, Vetter SW, Boyce SE, Goodin DB, Shoichet BK J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 14;357(5):1449-70. Epub 2006 Feb 2. PMID:16490206<ref>PMID:16490206</ref>
A model binding site was used to investigate charge-charge interactions in molecular docking. This simple site, a small (180A(3)) engineered cavity in cyctochrome c peroxidase (CCP), is negatively charged and completely buried from solvent, allowing us to explore the balance between electrostatic energy and ligand desolvation energy in a system where many of the common approximations in docking do not apply. A database with about 5300 molecules was docked into this cavity. Retrospective testing with known ligands and decoys showed that overall the balance between electrostatic interaction and desolvation energy was captured. More interesting were prospective docking scre"ens that looked for novel ligands, especially those that might reveal problems with the docking and energy methods. Based on screens of the 5300 compound database, both high-scoring and low-scoring molecules were acquired and tested for binding. Out of 16 new, high-scoring compounds tested, 15 were observed to bind. All of these were small heterocyclic cations. Binding constants were measured for a few of these, they ranged between 20microM and 60microM. Crystal structures were determined for ten of these ligands in complex with the protein. The observed ligand geometry corresponded closely to that predicted by docking. Several low-scoring alkyl amino cations were also tested and found to bind. The low docking score of these molecules owed to the relatively high charge density of the charged amino group and the corresponding high desolvation penalty. When the complex structures of those ligands were determined, a bound water molecule was observed interacting with the amino group and a backbone carbonyl group of the cavity. This water molecule mitigates the desolvation penalty and improves the interaction energy relative to that of the "naked" site used in the docking screen. Finally, six low-scoring neutral molecules were also tested, with a view to looking for false negative predictions. Whereas most of these did not bind, two did (phenol and 3-fluorocatechol). Crystal structures for these two ligands in complex with the cavity site suggest reasons for their binding. That these neutral molecules do, in fact bind, contradicts previous results in this site and, along with the alkyl amines, provides instructive false negatives that help identify weaknesses in our scoring functions. Several improvements of these are considered.


==About this Structure==
From MEDLINE&reg;/PubMed&reg;, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br>
2EUP is a [[Single protein]] structure of sequence from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saccharomyces_cerevisiae Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Full crystallographic information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=2EUP OCA].
</div>
<div class="pdbe-citations 2eup" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div>


==Reference==
==See Also==
Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site., Brenk R, Vetter SW, Boyce SE, Goodin DB, Shoichet BK, J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 14;357(5):1449-70. Epub 2006 Feb 2. PMID:[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16490206 16490206]
*[[Cytochrome c peroxidase 3D structures|Cytochrome c peroxidase 3D structures]]
[[Category: Cytochrome-c peroxidase]]
== References ==
<references/>
__TOC__
</StructureSection>
[[Category: Large Structures]]
[[Category: Saccharomyces cerevisiae]]
[[Category: Saccharomyces cerevisiae]]
[[Category: Single protein]]
[[Category: Boyce SE]]
[[Category: Boyce, S E.]]
[[Category: Brenk R]]
[[Category: Brenk, R.]]
[[Category: Goodin DB]]
[[Category: Goodin, D B.]]
[[Category: Shoichet BK]]
[[Category: Shoichet, B K.]]
[[Category: Vetter SW]]
[[Category: Vetter, S W.]]
[[Category: Engineered ligand binding site]]
''Page seeded by [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca OCA ] on Sun May  4 03:08:07 2008''

Latest revision as of 10:39, 23 August 2023

Cytochrome c peroxidase (CCP) in complex with 2-amino-5-picolineCytochrome c peroxidase (CCP) in complex with 2-amino-5-picoline

Structural highlights

2eup is a 1 chain structure with sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Full crystallographic information is available from OCA. For a guided tour on the structure components use FirstGlance.
Method:X-ray diffraction, Resolution 1.4Å
Ligands:,
Resources:FirstGlance, OCA, PDBe, RCSB, PDBsum, ProSAT

Function

CCPR_YEAST Destroys radicals which are normally produced within the cells and which are toxic to biological systems.

Evolutionary Conservation

Check, as determined by ConSurfDB. You may read the explanation of the method and the full data available from ConSurf.

Publication Abstract from PubMed

A model binding site was used to investigate charge-charge interactions in molecular docking. This simple site, a small (180A(3)) engineered cavity in cyctochrome c peroxidase (CCP), is negatively charged and completely buried from solvent, allowing us to explore the balance between electrostatic energy and ligand desolvation energy in a system where many of the common approximations in docking do not apply. A database with about 5300 molecules was docked into this cavity. Retrospective testing with known ligands and decoys showed that overall the balance between electrostatic interaction and desolvation energy was captured. More interesting were prospective docking scre"ens that looked for novel ligands, especially those that might reveal problems with the docking and energy methods. Based on screens of the 5300 compound database, both high-scoring and low-scoring molecules were acquired and tested for binding. Out of 16 new, high-scoring compounds tested, 15 were observed to bind. All of these were small heterocyclic cations. Binding constants were measured for a few of these, they ranged between 20microM and 60microM. Crystal structures were determined for ten of these ligands in complex with the protein. The observed ligand geometry corresponded closely to that predicted by docking. Several low-scoring alkyl amino cations were also tested and found to bind. The low docking score of these molecules owed to the relatively high charge density of the charged amino group and the corresponding high desolvation penalty. When the complex structures of those ligands were determined, a bound water molecule was observed interacting with the amino group and a backbone carbonyl group of the cavity. This water molecule mitigates the desolvation penalty and improves the interaction energy relative to that of the "naked" site used in the docking screen. Finally, six low-scoring neutral molecules were also tested, with a view to looking for false negative predictions. Whereas most of these did not bind, two did (phenol and 3-fluorocatechol). Crystal structures for these two ligands in complex with the cavity site suggest reasons for their binding. That these neutral molecules do, in fact bind, contradicts previous results in this site and, along with the alkyl amines, provides instructive false negatives that help identify weaknesses in our scoring functions. Several improvements of these are considered.

Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site.,Brenk R, Vetter SW, Boyce SE, Goodin DB, Shoichet BK J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 14;357(5):1449-70. Epub 2006 Feb 2. PMID:16490206[1]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

See Also

References

  1. Brenk R, Vetter SW, Boyce SE, Goodin DB, Shoichet BK. Probing molecular docking in a charged model binding site. J Mol Biol. 2006 Apr 14;357(5):1449-70. Epub 2006 Feb 2. PMID:16490206 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.01.034

2eup, resolution 1.40Å

Drag the structure with the mouse to rotate

Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)Proteopedia Page Contributors and Editors (what is this?)

OCA