6es5: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The | ==Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins== | ||
<StructureSection load='6es5' size='340' side='right'caption='[[6es5]], [[NMR_Ensembles_of_Models | 20 NMR models]]' scene=''> | |||
== Structural highlights == | |||
<table><tr><td colspan='2'>[[6es5]] is a 2 chain structure with sequence from [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human Human]. Full experimental information is available from [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocashort?id=6ES5 OCA]. For a <b>guided tour on the structure components</b> use [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-docs/fgij/fg.htm?mol=6ES5 FirstGlance]. <br> | |||
</td></tr><tr id='resources'><td class="sblockLbl"><b>Resources:</b></td><td class="sblockDat"><span class='plainlinks'>[http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-docs/fgij/fg.htm?mol=6es5 FirstGlance], [http://oca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocaids?id=6es5 OCA], [http://pdbe.org/6es5 PDBe], [http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=6es5 RCSB], [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum/6es5 PDBsum], [http://prosat.h-its.org/prosat/prosatexe?pdbcode=6es5 ProSAT]</span></td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<div style="background-color:#fffaf0;"> | |||
== Publication Abstract from PubMed == | |||
In every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in structure and dynamics during the evolution of a protein-protein interaction involving the intrinsically disordered CREBBP (CREB-binding protein) interaction domain (CID) and nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) from the transcriptional coregulators NCOA (nuclear receptor coactivator) and CREBBP/p300, respectively. The most ancient low-affinity "Cambrian-like" [540 to 600 million years (Ma) ago] CID/NCBD complex contained less secondary structure and was more dynamic than the complexes from an evolutionarily younger "Ordovician-Silurian" fish ancestor (ca. 440 Ma ago) and extant human. The most ancient Cambrian-like CID/NCBD complex lacked one helix and several interdomain interactions, resulting in a larger solvent-accessible surface area. Furthermore, the most ancient complex had a high degree of millisecond-to-microsecond dynamics distributed along the entire sequences of both CID and NCBD. These motions were reduced in the Ordovician-Silurian CID/NCBD complex and further redistributed in the extant human CID/NCBD complex. Isothermal calorimetry experiments show that complex formation is enthalpically favorable and that affinity is modulated by a largely unfavorable entropic contribution to binding. Our data demonstrate how changes in structure and motion conspire to shape affinity during the evolution of a protein-protein complex and provide direct evidence for the role of structural, dynamic, and frustrational plasticity in the evolution of interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins. | |||
Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins.,Jemth P, Karlsson E, Vogeli B, Guzovsky B, Andersson E, Hultqvist G, Dogan J, Guntert P, Riek R, Chi CN Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 24;4(10):eaau4130. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4130. eCollection, 2018 Oct. PMID:30397651<ref>PMID:30397651</ref> | |||
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.<br> | |||
[[Category: | </div> | ||
[[Category: Chi, N | <div class="pdbe-citations 6es5" style="background-color:#fffaf0;"></div> | ||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
__TOC__ | |||
</StructureSection> | |||
[[Category: Human]] | |||
[[Category: Large Structures]] | |||
[[Category: Chi, N C]] | |||
[[Category: Cid]] | |||
[[Category: Complex]] | |||
[[Category: Dna binding protein]] | |||
[[Category: Idp]] | |||
[[Category: Ncbd]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:12, 21 May 2019
Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteinsStructure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins
Structural highlights
Publication Abstract from PubMedIn every established species, protein-protein interactions have evolved such that they are fit for purpose. However, the molecular details of the evolution of new protein-protein interactions are poorly understood. We have used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate the changes in structure and dynamics during the evolution of a protein-protein interaction involving the intrinsically disordered CREBBP (CREB-binding protein) interaction domain (CID) and nuclear coactivator binding domain (NCBD) from the transcriptional coregulators NCOA (nuclear receptor coactivator) and CREBBP/p300, respectively. The most ancient low-affinity "Cambrian-like" [540 to 600 million years (Ma) ago] CID/NCBD complex contained less secondary structure and was more dynamic than the complexes from an evolutionarily younger "Ordovician-Silurian" fish ancestor (ca. 440 Ma ago) and extant human. The most ancient Cambrian-like CID/NCBD complex lacked one helix and several interdomain interactions, resulting in a larger solvent-accessible surface area. Furthermore, the most ancient complex had a high degree of millisecond-to-microsecond dynamics distributed along the entire sequences of both CID and NCBD. These motions were reduced in the Ordovician-Silurian CID/NCBD complex and further redistributed in the extant human CID/NCBD complex. Isothermal calorimetry experiments show that complex formation is enthalpically favorable and that affinity is modulated by a largely unfavorable entropic contribution to binding. Our data demonstrate how changes in structure and motion conspire to shape affinity during the evolution of a protein-protein complex and provide direct evidence for the role of structural, dynamic, and frustrational plasticity in the evolution of interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins. Structure and dynamics conspire in the evolution of affinity between intrinsically disordered proteins.,Jemth P, Karlsson E, Vogeli B, Guzovsky B, Andersson E, Hultqvist G, Dogan J, Guntert P, Riek R, Chi CN Sci Adv. 2018 Oct 24;4(10):eaau4130. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4130. eCollection, 2018 Oct. PMID:30397651[1] From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. References
|
| ||||||||||||||