Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Sandbox reserved 394 moved to Fragment-Based Drug Discovery: requested by Authors |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Drug Design: Fragment-Based Drug Discovery = | = Drug Design: Fragment-Based Drug Discovery = | ||
<StructureSection load='' size='500' side='right' caption='Bcl-xl in complex with ABT-737 (PDB entry [[2yxj]])' scene='Sandbox_reserved_394/Bcl-xl_abt-737_complex/ | <StructureSection load='' size='500' side='right' caption='Bcl-xl in complex with ABT-737 (PDB entry [[2yxj]])' scene='Sandbox_reserved_394/Bcl-xl_abt-737_complex/6'> | ||
Traditionally, new drugs are developed by either making small changes to existing drugs or by individually testing thousands of compounds. Both of these methods require many hours of laborious chemical synthesis. However, new techniques are being applied in the drug industry which show promise in decreasing the cost and time required to discover and develop new drugs. | Traditionally, new drugs are developed by either making small changes to existing drugs or by individually testing thousands of compounds. Both of these methods require many hours of laborious chemical synthesis. However, new techniques are being applied in the drug industry which show promise in decreasing the cost and time required to discover and develop new drugs. | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
''' | One technique used in drug discovery is '''fragment-based drug discovery''' (FBDD). FBDD is a method of discovering new compounds by utilizing fragments that have some degree of binding affinity for a drug target, optimizing those fragments so as to increase their binding affinity, then linking them together to form a lead compound that has high affinity and selectivity for the drug target. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and x-ray crystallography can be used to analyze the fragments and drug targets in order to create three-dimensional images which can be used to obtain an analysis of molecular relationships. This allows developers to get a visual representation of how each fragment binds to the target and can also be useful in identifying the individual binding sites of the target. | ||
[[Image:SAR by NMR Illustrated.png | thumb | center | 650px | Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (Adapted from Fig. 1)<ref name="Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.">Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.</ref>]] | [[Image:SAR by NMR Illustrated.png | thumb | center | 650px | Fragment-Based Drug Discovery (Adapted from Fig. 1)<ref name="Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.">Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.</ref>]] | ||
The development of <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Abt-737/ | The development of <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Abt-737/6'>ABT-737</scene> using SAR by NMR is a classic example of FBDD. (Throughout this discussion ABT-737 will be used to illustrate the FBDD process.) This compound has been shown to effectively inhibit the over-expression of <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Bcl-xl/1'>Bcl-xl</scene> which is a protein that is commonly observed to be over-expressed in many types of cancers.<ref name="Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579">Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579</ref> It acts an inhibitor of apoptosis and may also contribute to chemotherapy resistance. Bcl-xl inhibition by ABT-737 therefore, allows apoptosis to occur and helps to prevent chemo-resistance. | ||
{| class="wikitable collapsible" | {| class="wikitable collapsible" | ||
! scope="col" width="5000px" | SAR by NMR | ! scope="col" width="5000px" | SAR by NMR | ||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="col" width="5000px" | Structure-activity relationship (SAR) by NMR is one tool that | | scope="col" width="5000px" | Structure-activity relationship (SAR) by NMR is one tool that can be used to design and develop new drugs. This is the process in which NMR is used to identify the components responsible for binding to the protein. NMR is also used to analyze the relationships between these components to determine where the protein binding sites are located and how the ligand interacts with those sites.<ref name="Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.">Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.</ref> | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
===== ABT-737: ligand screening ===== | ===== ABT-737: ligand screening ===== | ||
<scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_1/ | <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_1/12'>Two fragments</scene> were found to have moderate affinity for Bcl-xl. <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_1/9'>Compound 1</scene> is a fluorobiphenylcarboxylic acid. It occupies <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Binding_site_1/4'>binding site 1</scene> of Bcl-xl which consists of Phe 101, Tyr 105, Ala 108, Phe 109, Leu 136, Gly 142, Arg 143, and Ala 146. The fluorobiphenyl system of compound 1 is very hydrophobic and therefore, these residues form a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_1/4'>"hydrophobic pocket"</scene> around the system. There is also one hydrophilic interaction involved in this complex. The <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_1/5'>carboxylic acid portion of compound 1 binds near Gly 142</scene> of Bcl-xl. This is not a strong interaction but is significant because it can be modified to form a much stronger bond. | ||
<scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_1/3'>Compound 2</scene> is a napthalene-based alcohol which occupies <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Binding_site_2/4'>binding site 2</scene> | <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_1/3'>Compound 2</scene> is a napthalene-based alcohol which occupies <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Binding_site_2/4'>binding site 2</scene>. This particular fragment also is involved with hydrophobic interactions with Bcl-xl, although they are not as strong as in the case of compound 1. This binding site includes Ala 97, Glu 100, Phe 101, Val 145, and Tyr 199. | ||
==== Ligand Optimization ==== | ==== Ligand Optimization ==== | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Compounds 1 & 2 exhibited very poor binding affinity for Bcl-xl. The optimization of these two compounds resulted in <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_2/1'>Compound 3</scene>. In order to improve the binding affinity, the carboxylic acid of compound 1 was substituted with an acyl sulfonamide to capitalize on the hydrophilic interaction with the protein. This <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_2/3'>acylsulfonamide portion forms a hydrogen bond with Gly 142</scene> thereby increasing the affinity for Bcl-xl. The substitution of the sulfonamide actually allows the acidic proton to get closer to Gly 142 than it could in the carboxylic acid, which is why it is able to bind stronger to the amino acid. | Compounds 1 & 2 exhibited very poor binding affinity for Bcl-xl. The optimization of these two compounds resulted in <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_2/1'>Compound 3</scene>. In order to improve the binding affinity, the carboxylic acid of compound 1 was substituted with an acyl sulfonamide to capitalize on the hydrophilic interaction with the protein. This <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_2/3'>acylsulfonamide portion forms a hydrogen bond with Gly 142</scene> thereby increasing the affinity for Bcl-xl. The substitution of the sulfonamide actually allows the acidic proton to get closer to Gly 142 than it could in the carboxylic acid, which is why it is able to bind stronger to the amino acid. | ||
Compound 2 was important in identifying the hydrophobicity of binding site 2 but was | Compound 2 was important in identifying the hydrophobicity of binding site 2 but affinity was increased by substituting a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Nitro_thio_phenyl_sub/1'>3-nitro-4-(2-phenylthioethyl)aminophenyl group</scene>. This substitution more efficiently binds to site 2 through <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Pi_stacking/3'>pi-pi interactions with Phe 101 and Tyr 199</scene>. This idea of using a known ligand to develop another ligand, and eventually drugs, is known as ligand-based drug design. | ||
{| class="wikitable collapsible" | {| class="wikitable collapsible" | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
|} | |} | ||
One challenge in drug delivery is bioavailability. The bioavailibility may be decreased due to non-specific protein binding. Therefore, compound 3 required further optimization because Bcl-xl affinity is greatly reduced in the presence of human serum albumin (HSA). In order to decrease HSA affinity, and therefore increase Bcl-xl affinity, SAR by NMR was used to modify compound 3 by eliminating key binding groups of the compound to HSA without affecting Bcl-xl affinity. | |||
{| class="wikitable collapsible" | {| class="wikitable collapsible" | ||
! scope="col" width="5000px" | Modifying compound 3 to reduce HSA affinity | ! scope="col" width="5000px" | Modifying compound 3 to reduce HSA affinity | ||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="col" width="5000px" | Compound 3 has high affinity for Bcl-xl but has an even higher affinity for HSA. For this reason, when HSA is present, compound 3 and similar ligands are more likely to bind to HSA thereby decreasing the amount that can bind with Bcl-xl. In order to decrease the affinity for HSA while maintaining affinity for Bcl-xl, SAR by NMR was used to compare compound 3 with a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/1'>compound 4</scene> (thioethylamino-2,4-dimethylphenyl analogue), which also has high affinity for HSA. It was found that <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/ | | scope="col" width="5000px" | Compound 3 has high affinity for Bcl-xl but has an even higher affinity for HSA. For this reason, when HSA is present, compound 3 and similar ligands are more likely to bind to HSA thereby decreasing the amount that can bind with Bcl-xl. In order to decrease the affinity for HSA while maintaining affinity for Bcl-xl, SAR by NMR was used to compare compound 3 with a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/1'>compound 4</scene> (thioethylamino-2,4-dimethylphenyl analogue), which also has high affinity for HSA. It was found that <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Compound_3/3'>two hydrophobic portions</scene> of compound 4 had very strong hydrophobic interactions with HSA. Therefore, these portions in compound 3 were modified with polar substituents to decrease HSA affinity. To decrease hydrophobicity, the fluorobiphenyl system was substituted with a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Piperazine_ring/2'>piperazine ring</scene> and a <scene name='Sandbox_reserved_394/Abt-737/4'>2-dimethylaminoethyl group</scene> was added to the thioethylamino linkage group. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:46, 25 June 2013
Drug Design: Fragment-Based Drug DiscoveryDrug Design: Fragment-Based Drug Discovery
Traditionally, new drugs are developed by either making small changes to existing drugs or by individually testing thousands of compounds. Both of these methods require many hours of laborious chemical synthesis. However, new techniques are being applied in the drug industry which show promise in decreasing the cost and time required to discover and develop new drugs.
Fragment-Based Drug DiscoveryOne technique used in drug discovery is fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD). FBDD is a method of discovering new compounds by utilizing fragments that have some degree of binding affinity for a drug target, optimizing those fragments so as to increase their binding affinity, then linking them together to form a lead compound that has high affinity and selectivity for the drug target. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and x-ray crystallography can be used to analyze the fragments and drug targets in order to create three-dimensional images which can be used to obtain an analysis of molecular relationships. This allows developers to get a visual representation of how each fragment binds to the target and can also be useful in identifying the individual binding sites of the target. ![]()
The development of using SAR by NMR is a classic example of FBDD. (Throughout this discussion ABT-737 will be used to illustrate the FBDD process.) This compound has been shown to effectively inhibit the over-expression of which is a protein that is commonly observed to be over-expressed in many types of cancers.[2] It acts an inhibitor of apoptosis and may also contribute to chemotherapy resistance. Bcl-xl inhibition by ABT-737 therefore, allows apoptosis to occur and helps to prevent chemo-resistance.
Ligand ScreeningThe first step of FBDD is to expose the potential drug target to a large number of small molecular fragments. This is usually done with a method known as high-throughput screening. High-throughput screening (HTS) is the process of using robotics to perform a large number of chemical tests. HTS is used to quickly identify fragments that have affinity for the target which are then analyzed to understand why they have affinity. ABT-737: ligand screeningwere found to have moderate affinity for Bcl-xl. is a fluorobiphenylcarboxylic acid. It occupies of Bcl-xl which consists of Phe 101, Tyr 105, Ala 108, Phe 109, Leu 136, Gly 142, Arg 143, and Ala 146. The fluorobiphenyl system of compound 1 is very hydrophobic and therefore, these residues form a around the system. There is also one hydrophilic interaction involved in this complex. The of Bcl-xl. This is not a strong interaction but is significant because it can be modified to form a much stronger bond. is a napthalene-based alcohol which occupies . This particular fragment also is involved with hydrophobic interactions with Bcl-xl, although they are not as strong as in the case of compound 1. This binding site includes Ala 97, Glu 100, Phe 101, Val 145, and Tyr 199. Ligand OptimizationOnce the fragments have been identified, they are then modified to increase their binding affinity. These modifications can include atom substitutions, the addition of substituents, or even the replacement of the entire fragment. Knowing and having an understanding of the structure of the biological target is useful in optimizing the fragments. The nature of the binding site is what determines how a ligand will bind (as in the case of the hydrophobic pocket formed around compound 1). This approach to designing drugs is referred to as structure-based drug design.
ABT-737: ligand optimizationCompounds 1 & 2 exhibited very poor binding affinity for Bcl-xl. The optimization of these two compounds resulted in . In order to improve the binding affinity, the carboxylic acid of compound 1 was substituted with an acyl sulfonamide to capitalize on the hydrophilic interaction with the protein. This thereby increasing the affinity for Bcl-xl. The substitution of the sulfonamide actually allows the acidic proton to get closer to Gly 142 than it could in the carboxylic acid, which is why it is able to bind stronger to the amino acid. Compound 2 was important in identifying the hydrophobicity of binding site 2 but affinity was increased by substituting a . This substitution more efficiently binds to site 2 through . This idea of using a known ligand to develop another ligand, and eventually drugs, is known as ligand-based drug design.
One challenge in drug delivery is bioavailability. The bioavailibility may be decreased due to non-specific protein binding. Therefore, compound 3 required further optimization because Bcl-xl affinity is greatly reduced in the presence of human serum albumin (HSA). In order to decrease HSA affinity, and therefore increase Bcl-xl affinity, SAR by NMR was used to modify compound 3 by eliminating key binding groups of the compound to HSA without affecting Bcl-xl affinity.
Ligand LinkingThe final step in FBDD is to link all of the individual, optimized fragments together to form one compound with very high affinity for the target. The goal is for all of the high-binding affinity characteristics of the fragments to be represented in one final, high-affinity compound. |
|
ReferencesReferences
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Shuker S. B., Hajduk P. J., Meadows R. P., Fesik S. W. Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR. Science; Nov 29, 1996; 274, 5292; ProQuest Central pg. 1531.
- ↑ Oltersdorf T., Elmore S. W., Shoemaker A. R. An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Vol 435|2 June 2005|doi:10.1038/nature03579
- ↑ Pandit D. LIGAND-BASED DRUG DESIGN: I. CONFORMATIONAL STUDIES OF GBR 12909 ANALOGS AS COCAINE ANTAGONISTS; II. 3D-QSAR STUDIES OF SALVINORIN A ANALOGS AS εΑΡΡΑ OPIOID AGONISTS. http://archives.njit.edu/vol01/etd/2000s/2007/njit-etd2007-051/njit-etd2007-051.pdf