User:Cameron Evans/Sandbox 1: Difference between revisions
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GluDH) is a member of the superfamily of amino acid dehydrogenase and functions in the cell to dehydrate α-ketoglutarate to the amino acid glutamate and also to perform the reverse reaction.<ref name="1bgv">PMID:8263917</ref> | Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GluDH) is a member of the superfamily of amino acid dehydrogenase and functions in the cell to dehydrate α-ketoglutarate to the amino acid glutamate and also to perform the reverse reaction.<ref name="1bgv">PMID:8263917</ref> | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Image:Glutamic acid.svg.png|[[Glutamic Acid]] | Image:Glutamic acid.svg.png|[[Glutamic Acid]] | ||
Image:Alpha- | Image:Alpha-ketoglutamate2.png |[[α-Ketoglutaraic acid]] | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
GluDH is at the threshold of carbon metabolism (GluDH feeds α-ketoglutarate into the tricarboxylic acid cycle) and nitrogen metabolism (the amine product is utilized by other biosynthetic pathways).<ref name="1hwxyz">PMID:11254391</ref>. Due to its prominent position on the threshold between catabolic and anabolic pathways, GluDH is ubiquitously expressed in both complex and simple organisms.<ref name="1hwx">PMID:10425679</ref> | |||
In vertebrates and plants, GluDH is preferentially found in the mitochondria, but also in the cytoplasm. In prokaryotes it is found in the cytosol.<ref>[http://www.brenda-enzymes.org/php/flat_result.php4?ecno=1.4.1.2&organism_list=&Suchword=&UniProtAcc=#LOCALIZATION EC 1.4.1.2] Brenda 2010</ref> | |||
Reductive amination of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) is the process by which the ketone is converted to an amine via an imine intermediate. The reverse reaction, oxidative deamination, is the conversion of the amine functional group to a ketone. | Reductive amination of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) is the process by which the ketone is converted to an amine via an imine intermediate. The reverse reaction, oxidative deamination, is the conversion of the amine functional group to a ketone. | ||
In vertebrates the produced ammonia is usually utilized in the urea cycle and in bacteria the ammonia is assimilated to amino acids and amidotransferases.<ref name="Lightfoot_1988">Lightfoot DA, Baron AJ, Wootton JC (1988). "Expression of the Escherichia coli glutamate dehydrogenase gene in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC6301 causes ammonium tolerance". Plant Molecular Biology 11 (3): 335-344. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/w2721u62r8021510/ doi 10.1007/BF00027390]</ref> | |||
Glutamate dehydrogenase shares sequence homology and structural homology to the superfamily of amino acid dehydrogenases, which supports the idea that this superfamily formed by divergent evolution. <ref name="1bgv" /> Because of the homology among all proteins in this superfamily, many dehydrogenases can work on multiple substrates. Nonetheless, GluDH appears to be very specific towards its substrates. | Glutamate dehydrogenase shares sequence homology and structural homology to the superfamily of amino acid dehydrogenases, which supports the idea that this superfamily formed by divergent evolution. <ref name="1bgv" /> Because of the homology among all proteins in this superfamily, many dehydrogenases can work on multiple substrates. Nonetheless, GluDH appears to be very specific towards its substrates. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
==Prokaryote== | ==Prokaryote== | ||
<applet load='1bgv' size='450' frame='true' align='Left' caption=' | <applet load='1bgv' size='450' frame='true' align='Left' caption='GluDH from ''Clostridium symbiosum''' /> | ||
===General Structure=== | ===General Structure=== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
===Specificity=== | ===Specificity=== | ||
<scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/1bgv_spec_pocket/2'>Specific interactions of | <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/1bgv_spec_pocket/2'>Specific interactions of ''Clostridium symbiosum'' GluDH to Glu</scene> are made up of polar interactions from K89 and S380 and hydrophobic interactions from G90, V377 and A163 to the sidechain. | ||
Glutamate binds within a pocket on the enzyme surface within the catalytic cleft, with its side chain pointed into this pocket. | Glutamate binds within a pocket on the enzyme surface within the catalytic cleft, with its side chain pointed into this pocket. | ||
The key determinant for enzymatic specificity – i.e., what separates GluDH from other dehydrogenases – is the interaction of K89 and S380 with the gamma | The key determinant for enzymatic specificity – i.e., what separates GluDH from other dehydrogenases – is the interaction of K89 and S380 with the gamma carboxylate of the substrate. The last three residues that make this interaction are highly conserved among amino acid dehydrogenases. These residues are all within the binding pocket. | ||
Outside of the specificity pocket, the alpha amino of the substrate hydrogen bonds with the main chain carbonyl of D165 and G164, and the alpha | Outside of the specificity pocket, the alpha amino of the substrate hydrogen bonds with the main chain carbonyl of D165 and G164, and the alpha carboxylate of the substrate hydrogen bonds to K113 and the side chain of Q110. <ref name="1bgv" /> | ||
The substrate binds deeper within the catalytic cleft than the cofactor. The cofactor binds with its ‘’Re’’ face buried against the enzyme, with its ‘’Si’’ face exposed to the solvent within the catalytic cleft, adjacent to the highly conserved residues responsible for substrate binding. <ref name="1bgv" /> In <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Cofactor_bind/1'>this scene</scene> the highly conserved residues are shown in red and the cofactor is shown in spacefill. | The substrate binds deeper within the catalytic cleft than the cofactor. The cofactor binds with its ‘’Re’’ face buried against the enzyme, with its ‘’Si’’ face exposed to the solvent within the catalytic cleft, adjacent to the highly conserved residues responsible for substrate binding. <ref name="1bgv" /> In <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Cofactor_bind/1'>this scene</scene> the highly conserved residues are shown in red and the cofactor is shown in spacefill. | ||
<scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Glycine/1'> Five glycine residues </scene> have been found to be critical in shaping this catalytic site – 122, 123, 90, 91, 376 | <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Glycine/1'> Five glycine residues </scene> have been found to be critical in shaping this catalytic site – 122, 123, 90, 91, 376 | ||
<applet load='Temp.pdb' size='300' frame='true' align='right' scene='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Morph_side_view/1' target='0' /> | |||
===Movement=== | ===Movement=== | ||
Upon substrate binding, GluDH undergoes an induced change that begins the necessary reaction. This change involves the movement of Domain II some 14 degrees relative to Domain I (which is fixed in the oligomer). This appears to "close" the cleft in which the substrate and the cofactor are bound. To fully terminate the reaction, the movement of the domains in the opposite direction (i.e., to the "open conformation") is required and the products are released. | Upon substrate binding, GluDH undergoes an induced change that begins the necessary reaction. This change involves the movement of Domain II some 14 degrees relative to Domain I (which is fixed in the oligomer). This appears to "close" the cleft in which the substrate and the cofactor are bound. To fully terminate the reaction, the movement of the domains in the opposite direction (i.e., to the "open conformation") is required and the products are released. | ||
| Line 48: | Line 52: | ||
==Eukaryote== | ==Eukaryote== | ||
<applet load='1nr1' size='450' frame='true' align='left' caption=' | <applet load='1nr1' size='450' frame='true' align='left' caption='GluDH from Bovine liver' /> | ||
===General Structure=== | ===General Structure=== | ||
| Line 54: | Line 58: | ||
Like most prokaryotic GluDH, Mammalian GluDH has been found to hexamerize as a dimer of | Like most prokaryotic GluDH, Mammalian GluDH has been found to hexamerize as a dimer of | ||
<scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Human_d_e_f/ | <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Human_d_e_f/4'>trimers</scene>. | ||
Furthermore,each <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Human_d_alone/1'>monomer</scene> of mammalian GluDH, like prokaryotic GluDH, is composed of two domains: Domain I, which is responsible for the assembly of the hexamer; and Domain II, which is responsible for dinucleotide binding (both true statements for prokaryotic GluDH). Furthermore, each domain is similar to the domains within csGluDH as <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Bogdh_2ndary/1'>each is a beta sheet flanked by alpha helices</scene>. | Furthermore,each <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Human_d_alone/1'>monomer</scene> of mammalian GluDH, like prokaryotic GluDH, is composed of two domains: Domain I, which is responsible for the assembly of the hexamer; and Domain II, which is responsible for dinucleotide binding (both true statements for prokaryotic GluDH). Furthermore, each domain is similar to the domains within csGluDH as <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Bogdh_2ndary/1'>each is a beta sheet flanked by alpha helices</scene>. | ||
Unlike csGluDH, the boGluDH monomer has 48 residue <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Tail_1/1'>"antenna"</scene> that assists in the trimerization process. <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Human_d_e_f/ | Unlike csGluDH, the boGluDH monomer has 48 residue <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Tail_1/1'>"antenna"</scene> that assists in the trimerization process. <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Human_d_e_f/6'>(The interactions of the antennae are best seen in the trimer)</scene>. These antennae appear to undergo conformational changes as the "mouth" of GluDH opens and closes. | ||
This 48 residue insertion (397-444), which does not exist in the sequences of prokaryotic GluDH, is thought to be significant for the allosteric interactions that distinguish mammalian GluDH from prokaryotic GluDH (see specific interactions below).<ref name=1hwx /> | This 48 residue insertion (397-444), which does not exist in the sequences of prokaryotic GluDH, is thought to be significant for the allosteric interactions that distinguish mammalian GluDH from prokaryotic GluDH (see specific interactions below).<ref name=1hwx /> | ||
===Specificity=== | ===Specificity=== | ||
| Line 84: | Line 86: | ||
The | The | ||
<scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Gtp_n_helix/1'>GTP binds between the active site of the monomer and the pivot helix | <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/Gtp_n_helix/1'>GTP binds </scene> between the active site of the monomer and the <font color='red'>pivot helix </font>. It is thought that GTP causes negative regulation of GluDH by increasing the enzyme's affinity for the product to the extent that the release of the product is the rate limiting step of the overall reaction. | ||
When the enzyme is highly saturated, the enzyme has been found to form an "abortive complex" that is the cofactor and the reagent locked in a non-catalytic conformation. Upon the binding of a positive regulator, like GDP or ADP, the protein is thought to be forced into the open conformation, driving the reaction is allowed to completion. ADP has also been shown to decrease the affinity of the enzyme to its products. | When the enzyme is highly saturated, the enzyme has been found to form an "abortive complex" that is the cofactor and the reagent locked in a non-catalytic conformation. Upon the binding of a positive regulator, like GDP or ADP, the protein is thought to be forced into the open conformation, driving the reaction is allowed to completion. ADP has also been shown to decrease the affinity of the enzyme to its products. | ||
| Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
=====Dinucleotides===== | =====Dinucleotides===== | ||
The NAD(P)(H) coenzyme is has also been shown to <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/2nd_cofactor/3'>bind in the same general region the other allosteric regulators bind</scene> - that is, between the pivot helix | The NAD(P)(H) coenzyme is has also been shown to <scene name='User:Cameron_Evans/Sandbox_1/2nd_cofactor/3'>bind in the same general region the other allosteric regulators bind</scene> - that is, between the <font color='red'>pivot helix </font> and the active site. Furthermore, this binding site appears to bind NAD(H) with ten times the affinity as NADP(H). As might be expected, the binding of the reduced coenzyme inhibits oxidative deamination, and the binding of the oxidized form promotes deamination. | ||
During reductive amination, NADPH is an inhibitor at pH 8, but not at pH7. Furthermore, NADPH binding is greatly enhanced in the presence of glutamate, where it inhibits the enzyme; however, the enhanced binding observed in the presence of ketoglutarate is not coupled with inhibition. | During reductive amination, NADPH is an inhibitor at pH 8, but not at pH7. Furthermore, NADPH binding is greatly enhanced in the presence of glutamate, where it inhibits the enzyme; however, the enhanced binding observed in the presence of ketoglutarate is not coupled with inhibition. | ||
| Line 106: | Line 108: | ||
In the apo form of csGluDH, K113 (domain I) is hydrogen bound to N373 (domain II) and stabilizes the open structure. On substrate binding, K113 moves to hydrogen bond to the alpha carbonyl of the substrate while maintaining contact with N373. This causes the conformational change which closes the cleft. Based on the crystal structures of csGluDH and previous binding studies with boGluDH, Stillman and Baker, ‘’et al’’ (1993) have proposed the following catalytic mechanism. | In the apo form of csGluDH, K113 (domain I) is hydrogen bound to N373 (domain II) and stabilizes the open structure. On substrate binding, K113 moves to hydrogen bond to the alpha carbonyl of the substrate while maintaining contact with N373. This causes the conformational change which closes the cleft. Based on the crystal structures of csGluDH and previous binding studies with boGluDH, Stillman and Baker, ‘’et al’’ (1993) have proposed the following catalytic mechanism. | ||
After substrate binding and monomer closing, (1) the alpha amino of the glutamate is deprotonated by E165, and (2) hydride transfer to the ‘’Si’’ face of the coenzyme. (3) The change in substrate geometry is sensed by K133and the closed conformation is thought to be brought even closer together to facilitate hydride transfer. (4) Water attacks the iminoketoglutarate intermediate and (5) the protons gained by K125 and D165 in catalysis are lost and the monomer returns to the open conformation. (The Principle of Microreversability dictates that the mechanism for reductive amination can be easily described in a backwards fashion). <ref name="1bgv" /> | After substrate binding and monomer closing, (1) the alpha amino of the glutamate is deprotonated by E165, and (2) hydride transfer to the ‘’Si’’ face of the coenzyme. (3) The change in substrate geometry is sensed by K133and the closed conformation is thought to be brought even closer together to facilitate hydride transfer. (4) Water attacks the iminoketoglutarate intermediate (to become the carbonyl oxygen) and (5) the protons gained by K125 and D165 in catalysis are lost and the monomer returns to the open conformation. (The Principle of Microreversability dictates that the mechanism for reductive amination can be easily described in a backwards fashion). <ref name="1bgv" /> | ||
The details of how ammonia fits into this mechanism remain unknown.<ref name="Lightfoot_1988" /> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||