Sandbox Reserved 1606
This Sandbox is Reserved from Jan 13 through September 1, 2020 for use in the course CH462 Biochemistry II taught by R. Jeremy Johnson at the Butler University, Indianapolis, USA. This reservation includes Sandbox Reserved 1598 through Sandbox Reserved 1627. |
To get started:
More help: Help:Editing |
ABCG2 Multidrug TransporterABCG2 Multidrug Transporter
BackgroundThe ABCG2 multidrug transporter is a membrane protein from the ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) transporter family, specifically the G-subfamily. Also known as the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), ABCG2 has physiological roles in various tissue cells including the mammary gland and the blood-brain, blood-testis, and maternal-fetal barriers.[1] ABCG2 protects cells by exporting xenobiotic molecules out of the cell using ATP hydrolysis. ABCG2 also affects the pharmacokinetics of many drugs and contributes to multidrug resistance.[2] Structural highlightsOverall StructureABCG2 is a homodimer with each monomer containing two domains, the nucleotide binding domain and the transmembrane domain , which are fused together as a single peptide chain.[1] The NBD binds and processes ATP and is located inside of the cell where it is exposed to the cytosol. The TMD is responsible for binding and transporting any foreign substrates and is embedded in the cell membrane and extends into the extracellular region (Figure 1). ATP Bound and Unbound ConformationsAs an ABC Transporter, ABCG2 exhibits ATPase activity by using the energy of ATP hydrolysis to facilitate transport. After substrates bind in the TMD, one molecule of (2 molecules of ATP total) causing a conformational change of the overall structure from an to an . ATP coordinates with various residues and a magnesium ion in the which is bordered with Walker A and B motifs. One molecule of ATP is hydrolyzed to transport substrates across the cell membrane while the second molecule of ATP is hydrolyzed to reset the transporter to its inward-facing conformation.[3] When ATP binds, α-helices in the NBD approximately 35° relative to the . This shift in the NBD causes slight shifts of α-helices in the TMD; these helices are relative to the . The overall shift from inward-facing to outward-facing promotes the transport of substrates through the transporter.[2] Cavities and Leucine PlugSubstrates are transported through ABCG2 via two cavities separated by a leucine plug (Figure 2). acts as a multidrug binding pocket and is formed by helices at the interface of the monomers in the TMD. When ATP is not bound to the NBDs, Cavity 1 is in order to recruit substrates for transport. Cavity 1 is and full of nonpolar, hydrophobic residues and, as a result, prefers nonpolar, hydrophobic substrates, particularly flat, polycyclic molecules. Substrates, such as estrone sulfate, with residues from each subunit in Cavity 1.[1] After substrates bind in Cavity 1, ATP binds each NBD leading to the transporter shifting from inward-facing to outward-facing. The outward-facing conformation results in the in the TMD in which the cavity is no longer . This collapse forces the substrate to move forward to Cavity 2 as there is no longer room in Cavity 1 to accommodate substrates.[2] , which is occluded when the protein in is the inward-facing conformation, is now open to the extracellular space and able to release the substrate. Cavity 2 contains a less hydrophobic environment and, as a result, substrates are released due to hydrophobic mismatch.[1] in the external loops near the exit of Cavity 2 also help promote substrate release.[2] Once Cavity 2 is empty, the protein reverts to the inward-facing conformation via hydrolysis of ATP. Cavities 1 and 2 are separated by a which likely acts as a substrate check-point during transport; changes to either of these leucine residues have exhibited an increase in transport and a decrease in substrate specificity.[2] After the substrate binds Cavity 1 and ATP molecules bind each NBD, the to allow the substrate to enter Cavity 2. Once the substrate enters Cavity 2, the plug is able to reform and promote substrate release and conversion to the inward-facing conformation. DiseaseDysfunctions in ABCG2 are linked to hyperuricemia which can lead to gout, kidney disease, and hypertension, all of which are thought to be the result of impaired transport of uric acid. Additionally, the expression of ABCG2 has been found to correlate with a poor prognosis and treatment outcome of various cancers including breast, ovarian, and lung.[4] CancerABCG2 hinders cancer treatment by contributing to multidrug resistance in tumor cells. ABCG2 exports xenbiotics, including vital anti-cancer drugs, which results in the inability to treat cancer cells. Cancer patients often show high levels of expression of multiple ABC transporters. For example, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has an increased expression of ABCB1, ABCG1, and ABCG2 while childhood AML shows an increased expression in ABCA3, ABCB1, ABCC3, and ABCG2.[5][6] Additionally, pancreatic cancer has shown an upregulation of ABCB4, ABCB11, ABCC1, ABCC3, ABCC5, ABCC10, and ABCG2.[7] The substrate specificity among ABC transporters varies, so this protein family can collectively export a wide variety of substrates and, ultimately, a wide variety of anticancer drugs. ABCG2 has been known to export anticancer drugs such methotrexate, mitoxantrone, topotecan, irinotecan, and flavopiridol[8]. Due to the high expression of multiple ABC transporters in cancer cells, simultaneous treatment of multiple transporters would likely be necessary for successful cancer treatment. InhibitorsDue to the potential for ABCG2 inhibition to aid in cancer treatment, efforts have been made to develop specific inhibitors of ABCG2 and other ABC transporters. The ABC transporter ABCB1, also known as multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1), was a therapeutic target in previous studies which produced three generations of MDR1 inhibitors, such as verapamil, valspodar, and zosuquidar; however, many of these inhibitors had neurotoxic effects that discouraged their use in cancer treatment.[9][10][11] While ABC transporter inhibition was dismissed after failed clinical trials, interest in revisiting ABC inhibition has reemerged due to new developments made in recent years.[3] For instance, Kol143 (Figure 3) is a compound derived from fungal toxin fumitremorgin C (FTC), a selective inhibitor of ABCG2 which exhibits undesirable neurotoxic effects.[12] Kol143 was found to be less toxic and more potent than FTC; however, this inhibitor is nonselective toward ABCG2.[13] Various inhibitors were derived from Kol143 with changes made at positions 1 and 2 in Figure 3, which are carbons 3 and 9 respectively. Modifications at these positions prove to affect the inhibitory capacities of compounds. A promising compound which has shown a high degree of potency is the inhibitor MZ29 (Figure 3).[4] ABCG2 inhibitors, , bind Cavity 1 and act as competitive inhibitors against ABCG2 substrates and show a higher affinity toward the transporter. Depending on the size of the inhibitor, one or two molecules can accommodate binding to the cavity and form within the binding site.[4] Many inhibitors are too big to be transported via the leucine plug resulting in the "clogging" of the transporter. With inhibitors acting as wedges, ABCG2 is locked in the inward-facing conformation and unable to transport molecules out of the cell.[2] |
ReferencesReferences
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Taylor NMI, Manolaridis I, Jackson SM, Kowal J, Stahlberg H, Locher KP. Structure of the human multidrug transporter ABCG2. Nature. 2017 Jun 22;546(7659):504-509. doi: 10.1038/nature22345. Epub 2017 May, 29. PMID:28554189 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature22345
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Manolaridis I, Jackson SM, Taylor NMI, Kowal J, Stahlberg H, Locher KP. Cryo-EM structures of a human ABCG2 mutant trapped in ATP-bound and substrate-bound states. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7731):426-430. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0680-3. Epub 2018 Nov, 7. PMID:30405239 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0680-3
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Robey RW, Pluchino KM, Hall MD, Fojo AT, Bates SE, Gottesman MM. Revisiting the role of ABC transporters in multidrug-resistant cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Jul;18(7):452-464. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0005-8. PMID:29643473 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41568-018-0005-8
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 Jackson SM, Manolaridis I, Kowal J, Zechner M, Taylor NMI, Bause M, Bauer S, Bartholomaeus R, Bernhardt G, Koenig B, Buschauer A, Stahlberg H, Altmann KH, Locher KP. Structural basis of small-molecule inhibition of human multidrug transporter ABCG2. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018 Apr;25(4):333-340. doi: 10.1038/s41594-018-0049-1. Epub, 2018 Apr 2. PMID:29610494 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41594-018-0049-1
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Marzac C, Garrido E, Tang R, Fava F, Hirsch P, De Benedictis C, Corre E, Lapusan S, Lallemand JY, Marie JP, Jacquet E, Legrand O. ATP Binding Cassette transporters associated with chemoresistance: transcriptional profiling in extreme cohorts and their prognostic impact in a cohort of 281 acute myeloid leukemia patients. Haematologica. 2011 Sep;96(9):1293-301. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.031823. Epub, 2011 May 23. PMID:21606172 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2010.031823
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Bartholomae S, Gruhn B, Debatin KM, Zimmermann M, Creutzig U, Reinhardt D, Steinbach D. Coexpression of Multiple ABC-Transporters is Strongly Associated with Treatment Response in Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Feb;63(2):242-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25785. Epub 2015 Oct, 29. PMID:26512967 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25785
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Mohelnikova-Duchonova B, Brynychova V, Oliverius M, Honsova E, Kala Z, Muckova K, Soucek P. Differences in transcript levels of ABC transporters between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and nonneoplastic tissues. Pancreas. 2013 May;42(4):707-16. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318279b861. PMID:23462326 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e318279b861
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Mao Q, Unadkat JD. Role of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in drug transport--an update. AAPS J. 2015 Jan;17(1):65-82. doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9668-6. Epub 2014 Sep 19. PMID:25236865 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-014-9668-6
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Leonard GD, Fojo T, Bates SE. The role of ABC transporters in clinical practice. Oncologist. 2003;8(5):411-24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.8-5-411. PMID:14530494 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.8-5-411
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Binkhathlan Z, Lavasanifar A. P-glycoprotein inhibition as a therapeutic approach for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer: current status and future perspectives. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2013 Mar;13(3):326-46. doi:, 10.2174/15680096113139990076. PMID:23369096 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/15680096113139990076
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 Witherspoon SM, Emerson DL, Kerr BM, Lloyd TL, Dalton WS, Wissel PS. Flow cytometric assay of modulation of P-glycoprotein function in whole blood by the multidrug resistance inhibitor GG918. Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Jan;2(1):7-12. PMID:9816083
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Allen JD, van Loevezijn A, Lakhai JM, van der Valk M, van Tellingen O, Reid G, Schellens JH, Koomen GJ, Schinkel AH. Potent and specific inhibition of the breast cancer resistance protein multidrug transporter in vitro and in mouse intestine by a novel analogue of fumitremorgin C. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002 Apr;1(6):417-25. PMID:12477054
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Weidner LD, Zoghbi SS, Lu S, Shukla S, Ambudkar SV, Pike VW, Mulder J, Gottesman MM, Innis RB, Hall MD. The Inhibitor Ko143 Is Not Specific for ABCG2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2015 Sep;354(3):384-93. doi: 10.1124/jpet.115.225482. Epub , 2015 Jul 6. PMID:26148857 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.115.225482
Student ContributorsStudent Contributors
Julia Pomeroy